<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />Elon: Failure Is ALWAYS an Option
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> It&rsquo;s staggering to think about, but the last time a human being walked on the moon was&hellip; 1972.
It&rsquo;s not for lack of technology. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s mostly a matter of money,&rdquo; says Paradigm&rsquo;s macroeconomics maven Jim Rickards.&nbsp;
Democrats spent money on handouts; Republicans spent money on wars. There wasn&rsquo;t much left over.
But here in 2026, &ldquo;Space is back on the front burner in a big way,&rdquo; says Jim.
&ldquo;What&rsquo;s different this time is that the effort is being privatized. Specifically, the space race is turning into a classic public-private collaboration where private-sector players provide most of the capital and technology while the government offers generous contracts to carry out NASA missions and highly classified tasks for the Pentagon.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Of course, the leader in this effort is SpaceX &mdash; which starts trading publicly as SPCX one week from today.
Compared with some of our other experts at Paradigm, Jim has had relatively little to say in recent weeks about SpaceX. But make no mistake: He&rsquo;s blown away by what SpaceX and Elon Musk have achieved.
&ldquo;Of course, SpaceX is a rocket company that plans to build thousands of its giant Starship rockets with reusable booster rockets. By delivering larger payloads and reusing the boosters, Musk expects to lower the cost of putting a kilogram into space to $185. That&rsquo;s only 1% of the historic cost of getting a payload to space.
&ldquo;Large rockets and cheap payloads are just the beginning of Musk&rsquo;s goals. SpaceX also owns Musk&rsquo;s artificial intelligence company xAI and his space-to-Earth internet company Starlink &mdash; the only profitable part of SpaceX today.
&ldquo;Musk&rsquo;s plan is to use SpaceX to launch a million or more power plants into space. These can run on &lsquo;free&rsquo; solar power 24/7. That power can then support a million space-based data centers, which can run the xAI applications more cheaply than Earth-based data centers.
&ldquo;The combination of cheap payloads, free energy, massive computing power, space-based internet and sheer scale could make Musk a monopolist of AI, energy and the internet.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Everyone else from Google to Anthropic and OpenAI would have to pay rent to Musk to tap into his energy-data nexus.
&ldquo;Of course, a lot could go wrong, but that&rsquo;s all in a day&rsquo;s work for Musk. He solves new problems with the same engineering prowess that he has used to get where he is today. Musk's view is that anything is possible as long as you don&rsquo;t defy the laws of physics.&rdquo;
And yes, things do go wrong. Like when Starship &mdash; a $100 million rocket the size of a skyscraper &mdash; exploded over the Indian Ocean two weeks ago today.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> But that&rsquo;s all part of the process. &ldquo;Failure, correctly understood, is a buy signal,&rdquo; says Paradigm AI authority James Altucher &mdash; who&rsquo;s had a lot to tell his subscribers about SPCX in recent weeks.
&ldquo;Elon Musk has been mocked, shorted and written off more times than most people have tried anything serious.
&ldquo;Tesla nearly went bankrupt. He's been through congressional hearings and the kind of public humiliation that would have finished most people.
&ldquo;He's also the richest person on Earth.&rdquo;
As Musk is fond of saying, &ldquo;If things are not failing, you are not innovating enough.&rdquo;
With that in mind, &ldquo;SpaceX doesn't treat a failed launch as a setback,&rdquo; says James. &ldquo;It treats it as data.&nbsp;
&ldquo;You launch, you fail, you learn, you launch again faster than anyone thought possible.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Every Starship test since 2023 has destroyed hardware. And every one of those destroyed rockets has pushed the engineering closer to something genuinely historic: bringing launch costs from $18,500 per kilogram &mdash; where they sat for decades &mdash; down toward a number that would have sounded like science fiction five years ago.
&ldquo;When the prize is that large, markets stop grading on perfection. They start grading on progress. And every failed attempt is evidence that progress is happening.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Which is why SpaceX can get away with bucking Wall Street tradition &mdash; as it did on Wednesday.
SPCX set a price for its shares more than a week before its planned listing &mdash; $135 each. The way it usually works with an IPO is the company sets a range and then adjusts it after a few days of meetings with investors.
Elon Musk is essentially saying, &ldquo;$135 &mdash; take it or leave it.&rdquo;
The brightest minds at Paradigm &mdash; Jim Rickards, James Altucher, Enrique Abeyta &mdash; agree that you should leave it.&nbsp;
SPCX is a fantastic company &mdash; but it&rsquo;s too richly valued. At $135 a share, the big payoff might not come for several years.
Besides, Jim and James and Enrique have pinpointed an early-stage investment tied to the growth of SpaceX with much more upside potential, and a much quicker payoff. They believe it could skyrocket as much as 3,000% in the next two&ndash;three years.
With that in mind, we&rsquo;re convening an event featuring all three of these experts. We&rsquo;re calling it The SpaceX SuperIPO Summit &mdash; and it&rsquo;s set for next Tuesday at 1:00 p.m. EDT.
At this exclusive online briefing, they will&hellip;
<ul>
<li>Reveal how this SuperIPO is part of Elon Musk&rsquo;s plan to unlock an entirely new multitrillion-dollar industry around a NEW type of artificial intelligence that has been called &ldquo;the final frontier&rdquo; of the AI revolution</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Discuss a NEW pre-IPO buy alert that could jump 30 times higher in the next 2&ndash;3 years&hellip; starting as soon as SpaceX goes public</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Reveal a big piece of the SuperIPO puzzle everyone is missing&hellip; and that could help Elon Musk unlock 700 times more wealth than the IPO itself&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Give you a chance to win an $8,000 Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional&hellip; the only watch NASA has ever officially certified for space missions</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Give you a FREE gift just for joining. You&rsquo;ll also get a list of SEVEN space-related stocks that they believe could skyrocket along with the IPO&hellip; completely free of charge.</li>
</ul>
And much more. Again, the SpaceX SuperIPO Summit is set for next Tuesday at 1:00 p.m. EDT. <a href="https://signups.paradigm-press.info/2526337">Click here to save your seat.</a>
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />Money Miscellany
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> While sky-high semiconductor stocks slipped yesterday, the medium-term outlook for the broad market remains strong.
&ldquo;The S&amp;P 500 has now traded more than 5% above its 50-day moving average for at least one month,&rdquo; says Paradigm trading pro Enrique Abeyta.&nbsp;
According to Bespoke Investment Group, that&rsquo;s happened 21 times in records going back to 1952. &ldquo;In all but one,&rdquo; Enrique tells us, &ldquo;the stock market was higher one year later!&rdquo;
That data lines up with Enrique&rsquo;s thesis that while the AI boom has parallels to the dot-com boom in the late 1990s, it is not yet that &ldquo;1999 moment&rdquo; when everything is about to fall apart.
&ldquo;Here is a chart,&rdquo; he submits, &ldquo;showing the number of the Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) members that are up at least 400% over the previous 12 months.&nbsp;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3nKSjd6vwQ4qFBY4lQhg6j/30766c3aa081abe27a1d73c72d401b20/FMF-Issue-060526-1.png" alt="Extreme Nasdaq winner" width="540px" />
&ldquo;We recently went to a high (six) that we have not seen since 2000.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Back in 2000? Twenty-two (!) of the components were up 400% or more. Think about that! Almost one in four stocks in the QQQ was a four-bagger over the previous year&hellip; wow.&nbsp;
&ldquo;THAT was a BUBBLE. Maybe we get there&hellip;&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Milestone: When it comes to the reserves maintained by the world&rsquo;s central banks, gold has just taken over U.S. Treasuries as the world&rsquo;s top asset.
A report from the European Central Bank says at year-end 2025, bullion accounted for 27% of global central bank reserve assets &mdash; up from 20% in 2024.
<a id="3"></a>In contrast, Treasuries fell from 25% to 22%.&nbsp;
Chalk it up to two factors: 1) The <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/groundhog-day-iran-edition#2">relentless gold accumulation by central banks</a> ever since Washington froze the U.S. Treasuries held by Russia&rsquo;s central bank in 2022, and 2) The big jump in the gold price during 2025, from under $2,700 to over $4,400.
That said, dollar-denominated assets still make up the biggest chunk of global reserves at 42%. The world wants to get out from under the dollar&rsquo;s thumb &mdash; but as we&rsquo;ve been wont to say over the years, &ldquo;de-dollarization&rdquo; is a process, not an event.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Abolish Property Taxes? (Sort Of&hellip;)
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> It&rsquo;s not an outright abolition of property taxes&hellip; but for many Floridians it would come close.
On Tuesday, the Florida legislature passed a resolution to amend the state constitution, radically curbing property taxes. Now it goes before the voters Nov. 3.
The measure would phase in a homestead exemption starting at $150,000 next year &mdash; jumping to $250,000 in 2028. It would also authorize the legislature to abolish property taxes altogether if it so chose.
In principle, the idea is wonderful. In practice, the problem is the same as the one we chronicled in 2012 and 2024 when North Dakota voters were given a choice to eliminate property taxes. (Both referendums went down in flames.)&nbsp;
To wit, property taxes currently make up almost 75% of local tax revenue in the Sunshine State. How would counties and municipalities make up the difference?
&ldquo;This isn't tax relief; instead, it is a shift of the tax burden,&rdquo; write the analysts at the Tax Foundation.&nbsp;
&ldquo;The state would likely need steep sales tax hikes to compensate &mdash; our <a href="https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/state/property-tax-repeal-replace-revenue">prior analysis</a> found full property tax elimination could push the combined state-local sales tax rate to over 15%, the highest in the nation.&rdquo;
If you&rsquo;re a Florida reader, you&rsquo;re a lot closer to the debate than we are &mdash; and we&rsquo;re interested in hearing your take.&nbsp;
Shoot us a line at <a href="mailto:feedback@paradigmpressroom.com">feedback@paradigmpressroom.com</a> and we&rsquo;ll share your input next week.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />First They Came for the Illegals&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> I know I&rsquo;m going to catch a lot of flak for what follows here. I don&rsquo;t care: This isn&rsquo;t about immigration policy, it&rsquo;s about the rights you and I are born with.
This week &mdash; in a development overlooked by both legacy and alternative media &mdash; the president signed an executive order accompanied by this post on his Truth Social platform.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/5uzMaJZmJZJvBtTULi6WXz/0d01d4dc20f17623956ff95425c40dfa/FMF-Issue-060526-2.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
OK, I get the surface objective here: Seizing illegal migrants&rsquo; bank accounts will encourage them to &ldquo;self-deport&rdquo; and leave the country on their own.&nbsp;
➢ It was the same rationale behind the now-abandoned <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/your-bank-wants-your-passport">proposal</a> that would have required you to present a passport or birth certificate to open a new bank account or even keep your current one.
But where&rsquo;s the due process?&nbsp;
As Judge Andrew Napolitano reminded us in his syndicated column a few days ago, &ldquo;The Fourth Amendment protects all persons in America &mdash; not just Americans &mdash; from warrantless searches and seizures of their &lsquo;persons, houses, papers, and effects&rsquo;.&rdquo;
Yes, compared with seizing bank accounts it&rsquo;s harder to physically track down and remove people in the country illegally.&nbsp;
Too bad. The Constitution&rsquo;s language is plain. The Framers recognized that rights denied to noncitizens will sooner or later be denied to citizens as well &mdash; at which point we&rsquo;re no longer citizens but subjects.
This won&rsquo;t stop with illegal migrants: If the feds can seize their accounts on the pretext of being in the country without the proper papers, they can seize yours for some other pretext &mdash; whether under Trump or under a future Democratic president.
<a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/deport-tucker-carlson">As we documented last year</a>, former Trump administration officials speak openly about &ldquo;debanking&rdquo; Tucker Carlson simply for engaging in what they see as &ldquo;hate speech.&rdquo;
Whatever your opinion about immigration policy, this is a slippery slope&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Comic Relief
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Going into the weekend, let&rsquo;s have a triple dose of good money-themed memes that made the rounds this week&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/65PpEtp6r4Zrmnu6s2xQLa/c9ce03ac94b4e47b904f907facefc16b/FMF-Issue-060526-3.png" alt="Benjamin Graham" width="540px" /> <img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3jokRGwqWnDLg56M2E6Qdg/d73c0c10a452a698ea7b247b0bfd335b/FMF-Issue-060526-4.png" alt="Monopoly" width="540px" /> <img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/69Ro5dH8PHJkEXVRAT1VrF/063018491dbea794a91289bc88931ceb/image1.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />

FMF-Issue-060526-Featured

mobile masthead 5MIN

Paradigm Pressroom’s 5 Bullets is a daily e-letter covering the economy and the markets, reaching 120,000 paying subscribers of the renowned financial publishing firm Paradigm Press.

Paradigm Pressroom's 5 Bullets

Elon: Failure Is ALWAYS an Option

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />Apple&rsquo;s &ldquo;Secret Supplier&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> People laughed in 2011 when our James Altucher forecast Apple would become a $1 trillion company.
At the time its market cap was barely a third of that total. The iPhone was already becoming a mature product. How could the company possibly triple in size from there?&nbsp;
But triple it did &mdash; reaching that lofty $1 trillion milestone on Aug. 2, 2018.
Here in 2026? AAPL is valued over $4.6 trillion.&nbsp;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;I think they&rsquo;re about to be the first $10 trillion company,&rdquo; James says now.&nbsp;
OK, James isn&rsquo;t sticking his neck out here the way he was 15 years ago. The company basically has to double to reach that target. Still impressive, though.
The catalyst for that growth, you ask?
Well, that comes back to what we covered here yesterday &mdash; the run-up to WWDC, Apple&rsquo;s annual Worldwide Developers Conference next week.
Apple is about to turn the AI world on its head in two ways&hellip;
<ul>
<li>It will make &ldquo;agentic AI&rdquo; simple and accessible. As colleague Chris Campbell described it last week in Altucher Confidential, AAPL is &ldquo;throwing its ecosystem open to AI agents that reach into your apps and actually do things&mdash;book the Uber, edit the photo, compare the prices&rdquo;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>It will perform essential AI tasks on your device &mdash; doing the hard work with only minimal input from a distant data center. That meets the Apple standard of simplicity, elegance and privacy.</li>
</ul>
Of course, you can buy Apple shares and wait patiently for the price to double over the next few years.
Or you can achieve far bigger gains much sooner by investing in a &ldquo;secret supplier&rdquo; to Apple &mdash; a company without which Apple will never achieve its lofty AI ambitions.
Which is exactly what James Altucher has done in the past. Only last year, in fact, he recommended shares of BTQ Technologies &mdash; a tiny stock in Apple&rsquo;s ecosystem &mdash; to a special group of his readers.
Shares shot up 1,025% in six months.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/JJqeZqWAt9zywKb3tBn8A/1d03534334993c62100d0cf339d5fdaf/FMF-Issue-060326-1.png" alt="BTQ" width="540px" />
And it&rsquo;s about to happen all over again with Apple&rsquo;s big AI reveal next Monday at WWDC.
Only this time, James thinks the profit potential is much bigger. &ldquo;Over time, over the next handful of years,&rdquo; he says, &ldquo;I think shares could soar as high as 23,519%. That&rsquo;s enough to turn $10,000 into $2.3 million.&rdquo; (How does he come up with such an exact figure? <a href="https://pro.paradigm-press.info/m/2526048">Watch here</a>.)
As mentioned yesterday, subscribers to James&rsquo; Microcap Millionaire service already know what company he&rsquo;s talking about. And they&rsquo;re scooping up shares &mdash; positioned for maximum profit once this company&rsquo;s identity becomes something &ldquo;everyone knows&rdquo; next week.
There&rsquo;s still time to act ahead of the keynote at WWDC next Monday. <a href="https://pro.paradigm-press.info/m/2526048">Click here and James will walk you through the urgent details</a>.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />Labor Day?!
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> U.S. oil futures are over $95 for the first time in nearly two weeks as it becomes evident that global oil flows won&rsquo;t normalize anytime soon.
In fact, Donald Trump himself acknowledged as much this morning in a rambling Truth Social post. He said the U.S. Navy blockade of Iranian ports might be lifted by&hellip; Labor Day.
As we&rsquo;ve tried to emphasize in these daily missives, the world doesn&rsquo;t have anywhere near that much time.&nbsp;
Even the legacy media are acknowledging as much now. Here&rsquo;s a Bloomberg chart&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/6wXXHabi8O4I54E0aSYEjA/1da04ed4326ab74257ada6e39cdc6649/FMF-Issue-060326-2.png" alt="World Oil Inventories" width="540px" />
The U.S. situation is better than the world situation, but that&rsquo;s not saying much. &ldquo;Based on current trends,&rdquo; tweets SoFi chief market strategist Liz Thomas, &ldquo;the Strategic Petroleum Reserve would reach operational minimum levels around August.&rdquo;
Later today the Energy Department releases its weekly U.S. inventory figures. GasBuddy&rsquo;s Patrick De Haan says inventories of distillates (diesel, jet fuel) will likely sit at 20-year lows.
California &mdash; whose plight we&rsquo;ve chronicled now and then in recent weeks &mdash; is on track to hit &ldquo;tank bottoms&rdquo; for diesel and jet fuel by July 4. As one wag says on X, &ldquo;California is going to be a fun place to be on America&rsquo;s 250th birthday.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Speaking of America&rsquo;s 250th birthday, here&rsquo;s one more reminder that our &ldquo;America 76/26&rdquo; event headlined by Jim Rickards is coming tomorrow.
It will come to you live from Philadelphia, a short distance from Independence Hall.
The fuel situation will surely be at the top of the agenda &mdash; along with the economic &ldquo;stagflation&rdquo; reminiscent of the 1970s. Jim and crew will also tackle precious metals, the rest of the commodity complex and the defense sector.
&ldquo;We will share actionable STOCK PICKS throughout the event tied directly to these trends,&rdquo; Jim promises.&nbsp;
And we will not try to sell you on one of our premium advisories.&nbsp;
Our exclusive livestream gets underway tomorrow at 1:00 p.m. EDT. To see the full agenda, <a href="http://rickardslive.com">check out our special event page at RickardsLive.com</a>.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Climbing the Wall of Worry
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Yes, the stock market is at all-time highs&hellip; and here&rsquo;s the most powerful indication that it&rsquo;s on track to move still higher.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/6m4p6Q3Y6KtywhaIEq29ZN/80abdcc6031a3542d681be6644386859/FMF-Issue-060326-3.png" alt="CNBC" width="540px" />
The headline is totally factual. But the fact CNBC brings it up suggests that even after 3&frac12; years, this bull market is still climbing the proverbial &ldquo;wall of worry.&rdquo;
The fact you&rsquo;re seeing all manner of references to the 1999 dot-com bubble in the corporate media? Ironically, that suggests the market still has legs.
It&rsquo;s when the media stops fretting over a bubble that you should start to worry.&nbsp;
In late 1999 and early 2000, no one outside a handful of cranky contrarian newsletter editors thought the party would ever end.&nbsp;
But end it did in early 2000&hellip; and the Nasdaq ground down 78% by late 2002.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> For today, the bull is taking a breather.
All the major indexes are in the red as we write, but not much: The S&amp;P 500 is down a third of a percent, back below 7,600.
➢ Congratulations are in order for Greg Guenthner&rsquo;s Trading Desk readers &mdash; who rode the revival in software stocks to 365% gains yesterday playing call options on Zeta Global Holdings. Not bad for less than a week!
Rising oil prices are feeding through to rising inflation expectations and thus rising Treasury yields: The 30-year bond is once more knocking on the door of 5%.
Gold is sinking to its lowest since late March at $4,451. Silver is testing recent support at $73.56.
The relentless punishment of crypto continues: Bitcoin is below $67,000 for the first time in two months and Ethereum is down to $1,858.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Meanwhile, traders are still trying to make heads or tails of Donald Trump&rsquo;s latest executive order and its impact on the AI industry.
As we chronicled throughout the month of May, the Trump administration was revisiting its promise last year of a hands-off approach to AI regulation. An executive order was in the works, set to be signed with great fanfare on May 21.
But then the president nixed it at the last minute &mdash; concerned that it went too far and would hamstring the industry&rsquo;s ability to compete with Chinese AI.
Yesterday, amid zero fanfare, he signed an executive order that appears to be scaled down from the original.&nbsp;
In a way, it&rsquo;s a continuation of a Biden-era policy in which major AI firms share their models with the feds before they&rsquo;re released to the public.
It appears to be voluntary. The feds have a 30-day review period, down from an original 90-day proposal.
Venture capitalist David Sacks, previously the White House AI and crypto czar and an advocate of a hands-off approach, says he&rsquo;s pleased with the outcome: &ldquo;It allows our AI labs to comply with the voluntary framework without delaying new model releases.&rdquo;
Others aren&rsquo;t so sure: One former Trump AI adviser frets to The Wall Street Journal that the government is going down the slippery slope toward a scheme in which AI models will have to get a federal license before release. Ugh&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Sign of the Times
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> We present the following with no further comment&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/5vKhUT30xLrR5wbnA8HKf6/eadc03a7288a31be840a04df21fed9a7/FMF-Issue-060326-4.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Only 5 Bullets?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Thanks for the sidearm (even though it's not a six-shooter),&rdquo; says a note of praise from a new reader.
&ldquo;I really enjoyed the updates in the new briefing. I also appreciate that it is available for free to subscribers of one or more of your publications.
&ldquo;It is a great gesture that shows you care about your customers&mdash;a detail that is often overlooked by other sources.&rdquo;
Dave responds: You&rsquo;re too kind. And for any other newcomers who want to learn &ldquo;who we are and what we&rsquo;re all about,&rdquo; <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/who-we-are-and-what-were-all-about">there&rsquo;s this</a>.
Funny about the firearm reference: After this e-letter adopted its current name in 2022, a reader wrote in to say something to the effect of, &ldquo;Only 5 Bullets? What, you&rsquo;ve got California-level limits on magazines?&rdquo;

FMF-Issue-060326-Featured

Apple’s “Secret Supplier”

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />AI&rsquo;s iPhone Moment
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Next week is when Apple gets serious about AI. Or more to the point, next week is when Apple shows the world how serious it&rsquo;s been about AI for several years now.
You might think Apple is behind the curve. After all, Apple doesn&rsquo;t make BIG HONKING AI HEADLINES day after day the way that Nvidia, Microsoft and Google do.
But that&rsquo;s not the Apple way &mdash; as Paradigm AI authority James Altucher explained in this space two years ago.
&ldquo;Apple is taking a slower and more cautious approach to releasing customer-facing applications of AI,&rdquo; he said.
&ldquo;Apple has a history of waiting to optimize new technologies before releasing them to the market. Apple&rsquo;s slow delivery in the AI space would suggest the company believes today&rsquo;s AI technology does not meet its standards and that there's more innovation that can be squeezed out to produce the perfect product.&rdquo;
This has long been the Apple way: Let Sony screw up a digital music player&hellip; while Apple quietly perfects the iPod. Let BlackBerry and Palm make the early mistakes on a smartphone&hellip; while Apple refines the iPhone so it&rsquo;s a must-have item from Day 1.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> And so it goes here. Apple&rsquo;s looking pretty smart right around now compared with the so-called hyperscalers like Microsoft and Google.
The hyperscalers are spending like mad on data centers &mdash; at a pace they&rsquo;ve never spent in their history.&nbsp;
To finance it, they&rsquo;re taking on gobs of new debt &mdash; and in the case of Google this week, issuing $80 billion in new shares.
Look at the growth trajectory posted on social media just this morning&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/guWUNLgfZjtVB9xSgWivr/57e7ca899e4edabab30198d212b05dd6/FMF-Issue-060226-1.png" alt="Trajectory" width="540px" />
Apple is taking an entirely different approach &mdash; AI on your device.
And the wraps finally come off next week during Apple&rsquo;s big annual WWDC event &mdash; the Worldwide Developers Conference.
It could be nothing less than the &ldquo;iPhone Moment&rdquo; for AI &mdash; you know, that day in 2007 when Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone to the world.
What&rsquo;s in the works is something that Altucher Confidential readers have been hip to since late March &mdash; and that got mainstream confirmation last week from Bloomberg.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> On the one hand, it&rsquo;s tempting to call it a souped-up Siri &mdash; but that totally undersells the level of transformation.
Apple&rsquo;s aim is nothing less than to bring &ldquo;agentic AI&rdquo; to the masses.&nbsp;
In theory, AI agents are supposed to &mdash; for example &mdash; rebook your cancelled flight plus a rideshare plus a hotel and notify your family and work colleagues in less time than it takes you now to pull up your airline&rsquo;s app or walk to a help desk.
So far, it works better in theory than in practice. But Apple intends to make it real, and make it simple.
Again, Apple is biding its time to get everything right &mdash; and irresistible.&nbsp;
What&rsquo;s more, the hardware and computing power making it all possible? It won&rsquo;t reside in a distant data center. It&rsquo;ll be right there on your phone.
Of course, Apple can&rsquo;t pull off something this ambitious by itself&hellip; and James Altucher says he&rsquo;s found &ldquo;hard evidence that a small, $1 billion company is behind Apple&rsquo;s big push into AI.
&ldquo;This is not public knowledge. Neither Apple, nor this company, have confirmed this partnership. But I found the smoking gun.
&ldquo;It basically proves Apple is working with this company. And quite frankly, I think this has the makings of my next 1,000% winner.&rdquo;
James&rsquo; Microcap Millionaire readers are already clued in to the identity of this company. If you&rsquo;re not among them, <a href="https://pro.paradigm-press.info/m/2525964">you owe it to yourself to follow this link</a>. Because once everyone else figures it out during WWDC next Monday, it&rsquo;ll be too late to maximize the profit potential. <a href="https://pro.paradigm-press.info/m/2525964">Give it a look now</a>.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />95 Days and Counting
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> U.S. oil futures sit at $92 this morning &mdash; giving up none of yesterday&rsquo;s monster gains.
As mentioned at the conclusion of yesterday&rsquo;s edition, Iranian leaders are fed up that Israel continues to bomb Lebanon &mdash; so they&rsquo;ve broken off their indirect talks with the United States.
Today is Day 95 of the war and Day 56 of a tenuous ceasefire.&nbsp;
&ldquo;When the war started on Feb. 28, President Trump said that it would be over quickly because of massive U.S. bombardment and the killing of practically all of Iran&rsquo;s religious, military and civilian leaders,&rdquo; says Paradigm macroeconomics authority Jim Rickards.
So as long as the stalemate drags on, &ldquo;It appears that Trump is engaged in a protracted propaganda effort. He's trying to prop up support for the war among the American people and in Congress. He&rsquo;s trying to keep the negotiations alive by combining his happy talk with threats to resume large-scale attacks on Iran if they don&rsquo;t make his claims come true.
&ldquo;Most of all, Trump seems to be trying to boost the stock market and lower gasoline prices by painting a picture of a world where the war is over soon.&rdquo;
But after 95 days, Jim says bluntly that &ldquo;the Trump show is getting old. He&rsquo;s losing credibility. Markets may soon reprice for the reality, which is a far cry from Trump&rsquo;s claims.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Investors are not ready for this. They should be.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Program note: We&rsquo;re less than 48 hours away from a special LIVE and FREE briefing that Jim Rickards and his team are hosting ahead of the nation&rsquo;s 250th birthday.
They&rsquo;ll gather not far from Independence Hall in Philadelphia on Thursday at 1:00 p.m. EDT.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/6zCEpq1P3crt8ykJOlZHbn/dc65b692af8cbb50e3e2a79e413be05c/FMF-Issue-060226-2.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
&ldquo;The headlines are moving fast,&rdquo; says Jim &mdash; &ldquo;but underneath the surface, far bigger forces are beginning to collide.&rdquo;
Among the topics on the agenda&hellip;
<ul>
<li>Inflation and its impact on Americans</li>
<li>Energy markets and the Strait of Hormuz crisis</li>
<li>Gold, commodities and hard assets</li>
<li>America First policies and resource independence</li>
<li>Key sectors and investment themes we believe could outperform ahead.</li>
</ul>
Yes, there will be names and ticker symbols &mdash; so make sure you can take notes.&nbsp;
And no, we won&rsquo;t try to sell you anything &mdash; so you don&rsquo;t have to keep your wallet handy.
You can check out the full agenda and reserve your spot <a href="http://rickardslive.com/">when you click here on our special event page</a>.&nbsp;
And now back to the Persian Gulf for Bullet No. 3&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Barnacleypse Now
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens tomorrow, it will take months to unsnarl global supply chains &mdash; a process that will include cleaning barnacles off oil tankers and cargo ships.
Yes, barnacles.
&ldquo;Who knew that mooring your tanker or cargo ship idle in the warm Persian Gulf for three months could encourage growth of&hellip; barnacles?&rdquo; says Paradigm oil expert (and 30-year Navy veteran) Byron King.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/cWZF3PKyLWnEXnfQm6sna/2caa2315531c2b30d2bb0f1a7c08c41a/FMF-Issue-060226-3.png" alt="Barnacles" width="350px" /> And that&rsquo;s just the propeller, not the hull&hellip; [Photo posted by the shipping-data firm Marhelm on X]
&ldquo;And now it dawns upon shippers everywhere that we have hundreds of vessels unfit to sail because their hulls are fouled. Worse, even the propellers are encrusted. And no ship is going anywhere with this kind of crud on the propulsive mechanisms.&rdquo;
Or if they can, by one estimate their fuel economy is cut by 40&ndash;80%.
&ldquo;Seriously,&rdquo; Byron goes on, &ldquo;this is not a minor issue; there's no quick-fix solution because hull cleaning requires (not cheap) drydocking, and/or well-trained diving teams with specific kinds of mechanical equipment. It's not free, not by any means.
&ldquo;And then we have the &lsquo;environmental&rsquo; angle, which mandates hull-cleaning permits because this stuff is gunky and the residue must go somewhere... even in the Middle East.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Point is... &lsquo;reopening&rsquo; the Gulf via the Strait of Hormuz is not a simple task. There's no such thing as just &lsquo;turning the key,&rsquo; cranking up the ship and sailing oil, LNG and other cargos through the passageway and out onto the high seas.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> But barnacles are the furthest thing from Mr. Market&rsquo;s mind on this Tuesday.
All the major U.S. stock indexes are in the green and in record territory, the S&amp;P 500 now over 7,600. The big buzzy story of the day is Claude maker Anthropic filing its plans to go public. No date is set yet but it will be the second mega-IPO of the year after SpaceX and before OpenAI.
The Paradigm editors have racked up a string of winners for their readers in the last 24 hours&hellip;
<ul>
<li>101% on Unity Software calls in Altucher&rsquo;s True Alpha</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>20% on a leveraged Microsoft ETF and 30% on Atlassian shares in Enrique Abeyta&rsquo;s The Maverick&hellip; plus nearly 100% gains in a week on Atlassian call options</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>328% on Rivian calls and 700% on Apple calls in Chris Cimorelli&rsquo;s 10X Trade Club&hellip; plus a clean 10X on Virgin Galactic calls</li>
</ul>
Gold is back above $4,500, if barely. But silver is up over a buck to $75.80
Crypto is getting beaten with an ugly stick &mdash; Bitcoin approaching three-month lows just over $67,000 and Ethereum clinging to the $1,900 level.
&ldquo;No one cares about crypto right now,&rdquo; observes colleague Greg Guenthner at The Trading Desk. &ldquo;They&rsquo;re too busy making money in the memory names. We&rsquo;d be wasting our time trying to pick bottoms in these out-of-favor groups like crypto. Sure, I think they&rsquo;ll bounce eventually. But right now, the hot money is elsewhere.&rdquo;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Financial Follies
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> And now for a case of mistaken identity&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4ulXelVGLkvsSELXvnDrmy/57c86bd0a8521039b2f012a7de92c931/FMF-Issue-060226-4.png" alt="pub" width="540px" />
Yep, Richard Branson&rsquo;s Virgin Galactic (SPCE) has rallied hard in recent weeks &mdash; in large part because &ldquo;investors&rdquo; who don&rsquo;t know any better are plowing money into it thinking they&rsquo;re buying shares of Elon Musk&rsquo;s SpaceX (SPCX).
Of course, SPCX doesn&rsquo;t go public for another 10 days.
<ul>
<ul>➢</ul>
</ul>
Note well 
<ul>
<ul>what we mentioned a few moments ago &mdash; the 1,000% gains on SPCE call options in our</ul>
</ul>
10X Trade Club
<ul>
<ul>service. Chris Cimorelli had a solid fundamental case for SPCE back in April &mdash; but once in a while it&rsquo;s better to be lucky than good!</ul>
</ul>
The tweet above implies this is the first time anything like this has happened. Hardly.&nbsp;
Deep in our voluminous archives is an episode from 2013 in which Twitter was about to go public as TWTR &mdash; and people who didn&rsquo;t know any better bid up the shares of Tweeter, a bankrupt electronics retailer trading as TWTRQ.
And in 2021 we <a href="https://5minforecast.com/2021/02/12/blooper-trades/">drew your attention</a> to academic research demonstrating these &ldquo;blooper trades&rdquo; happen way more often than you might think.&nbsp;
What&rsquo;s more, it seems a lot of them surround Elon Musk, go figure&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Before we move on, a quick 5 Bullets follow-up: Amazon has abandoned its internal leaderboard tracking employees&rsquo; use of AI tools.
Last week we told you how Amazon employees are <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/the-yamanaka-secret/#4">&ldquo;running up the score&rdquo;</a> when it comes to AI agents. That is, they&rsquo;re automating useless tasks just to consume AI tokens &mdash; because Amazon was tracking token consumption on internal leaderboards.
Whelp, the leaderboard is no more.
&ldquo;Please don&rsquo;t use AI just for the sake of using AI,&rdquo; says a memo from senior VP Dave Treadwell.
&ldquo;The move highlights how tech groups&rsquo; efforts to encourage the use of AI can lead workers to try to game performance measures with pointless activity,&rdquo; says the Financial Times &mdash; &ldquo;increasing infrastructure expenses.&rdquo;
You mean, the &ldquo;compute&rdquo; from data centers isn&rsquo;t an infinite resource? Say it ain&rsquo;t so!
Which nicely tees up today&rsquo;s mailbag&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: AI Data Center Backlash
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> On the subject of AI and electricity &mdash; <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/backlash-data-centers">and the growing backlash to AI data centers</a> &mdash; a reader writes&hellip;
&ldquo;The energy solution is simple. If you build an AI center you mandatorily have to build an energy source to operate it. No plugging into the grid.&rdquo;
Dave responds: To some extent this is what&rsquo;s already happening out of necessity &mdash; to wit, the natural gas turbines running the Colossus plant in Memphis owned by SpaceX&rsquo;s xAI division. Or Microsoft&rsquo;s deal with Constellation Energy to restart the undamaged reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, which was shuttered in 2019.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> In a related and unarguably positive development&hellip; Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine has ordered a pause to the sales tax break that data centers get in the Buckeye state.
When a sales tax exemption was first extended to data centers, the thinking was that the economic growth generated by data centers would be so massive that it would dwarf the $136 million in revenue the state would give up.
But that original $136 million estimate for 2025 turned out to be&hellip; $1.5 billion.&nbsp;
(Gee, the state&rsquo;s bean counters were off by only an order of magnitude&hellip;)
&ldquo;The numbers have triggered a firestorm inside the Ohio Statehouse,&rdquo; says the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, &ldquo;as lawmakers from both parties demanded answers about how the estimates ended up so dramatically wrong.&rdquo;
With any luck, state leaders elsewhere will take Ohio&rsquo;s cue and stop giving tax breaks and other special favors to the industry. Data centers must compete on the proverbial level playing field.

FMF-Issue-060226-featured

AI’s iPhone Moment

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />The Problem With the SpaceX IPO
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;We&rsquo;re about to watch a transfer of cash from&hellip; ordinary people to the very rich,&rdquo; said the veteran radio host John Batchelor last night.
He was speaking of SpaceX&rsquo;s IPO, set for this Friday.
He invoked the railroad boom of the 19th century &mdash; and the relentless pitches to own, say, shares of the Erie Railroad in 1870.
In both cases the appeal was that you could own a piece of the future.
But in both cases that ownership came at a ridiculously high price for everyday Americans &mdash; ridiculously high relative to the price that early investors paid.
Still, it&rsquo;s all good for those early investors, who in the case of SpaceX will cash out big-time a few months from now once the &ldquo;lockup&rdquo; period is over.
Meanwhile, if the history of other recent IPOs is any indication, everyday folks who buy in on Day 1 will be watching red on their screens for months on end. Example: Facebook shares tumbled 40% after the company went public in 2012.
Yes they roared back and Facebook, now Meta, trades for nearly 20X that initial 2012 value. But how many of those Day 1 buyers sold in disgust within a few weeks or months and booked a loss?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />Which brings us to a couple of headlines from Friday. It seems both the federal government and Wall Street are bound and determined to rope as many everyday people into this wealth transfer as possible.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/301oenxHeAtQr5QNjzFtHH/85133a0f6491e2afc301590ab9021ed1/zack_voell_x.png" alt="X Screenshot" />
Those were real headlines &mdash; although they prompted some amusing parodies as well&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4hc08U3NX5V1lLGoZoV6Vp/5e4000310a46a25f5edf3136b47e417e/arun_chopra_x.png" alt="X Screenshot" />
All kidding aside, it&rsquo;s for reasons like these that in a special email on Friday I explained why our experts are urging you to steer clear of the SpaceX IPO.
Our AI authority James Altucher&hellip; our macro maven Jim Rickards&hellip; our trading pro Enrique Abeyta&hellip; They frequently disagree, but on this point they&rsquo;re in lockstep. They don&rsquo;t want to see you take the hit that millions of Americans are setting themselves up for this week.
Besides, they&rsquo;re also in accord about a much better way to play the SpaceX frenzy &mdash; an early-stage investment tied to the growth of SpaceX with profit potential of up to 3,000% in the next two&ndash;three years.
All three of our top experts will lay out their cases during an exclusive online briefing titled The SpaceX SuperIPO Summit &mdash; tomorrow June 9 at 1:00 p.m. EDT.
They&rsquo;ll also give you a list of seven space-related stocks they believe could skyrocket along with the IPO, in a report that&rsquo;s yours FREE just for hearing their thesis. <a href="https://signups.paradigm-press.info/2526671" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click here to instantly reserve your seat</a>.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />After Friday&rsquo;s Rout
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />It appears the U.S. stock market will defy history today.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3a9mogpKFVsoPyg1OZV4ll/af113efac2f508c87a13951cd51074bd/odd_stats_x.png" alt="X Screenshot" />
Over the last 40 years there&rsquo;ve been 15 Fridays in which the Nasdaq took a steep tumble &mdash; including three days ago. On average, the following Monday has resulted in further 1.4% drop.
A day like this last Friday was inevitable.
The semiconductor stocks were weeks into a hyperbolic rally that couldn&rsquo;t go on forever. Apprehensions about AI were building after the chipmaker Broadcom delivered a blockbuster earnings report &mdash; but its forecast going forward didn&rsquo;t match up with Wall Street analysts&rsquo; giddy expectations.
The possibility of a continued tech meltdown today was significant: South Korea&rsquo;s KOSPI index &mdash; dominated by chipmakers Samsung and SK Hynix &mdash; collapsed 8.3% on the day. Taiwan&rsquo;s TAIEX &mdash; dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor &mdash; tumbled 3.5%.
But at last check this morning, the Nasdaq is up 1.8% on the day and the S&amp;P 500 up 1.1%.
Why the divergence?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />For once the corporate media are silent about the &ldquo;reasons&rdquo; behind today&rsquo;s rally. But from our perch, it seems pretty obvious.
Donald Trump was aboard Air Force One on Friday afternoon, headed to an appearance in Wisconsin&rsquo;s Chippewa Valley region. He mused to reporters about the possibility of the U.S. government taking ownership stakes in AI companies.
&ldquo;There&rsquo;s a concept out there where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies&hellip; where the American people can benefit from the success of AI and by doing that they are going to like it better.&rdquo;
Asked whether it felt strange to be &ldquo;on the same page&rdquo; in this regard with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) &mdash; Sanders has proposed the government take a 50% ownership stake in major AI firms &mdash; Trump said, &ldquo;As far as economics are concerned, we have certain things that are not that far apart.&rdquo;
Near as we can tell, these remarks did not become public record until after the market closed on Friday.
As we have seen frequently over the last year &mdash; indeed, it&rsquo;s a trend that&rsquo;s been very profitable for some of Paradigm&rsquo;s readership &mdash; the feds taking an ownership stake in a company can drive up that company&rsquo;s share price big-time.
Of course the chatter here is entirely hypothetical. But it&rsquo;s probably enough to give the U.S. tech market a bit of a lift today.
➢ Checking in on precious metals, they&rsquo;re licking their wounds after a severe drubbing on Friday. Gold is more or less flat at $4,336 while silver is up nearly a buck to $68.67. But as a practical matter, both metals are mired near their late-March lows.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Who Calls the Shots?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />U.S. oil futures instantly zoomed from $90 up past $95 when trading opened last night for a new week.
Let&rsquo;s reconstruct what happened while the markets were closed over the weekend.
It appeared U.S. and Iranian negotiators were making progress toward some sort of agreement. An agreement is the last thing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants &mdash; but &ldquo;he won&rsquo;t have any choice,&rdquo; Trump told the Financial Times. &ldquo;I call the shots. I call all the shots. He doesn&rsquo;t call the shots.&rdquo;
And then, knowing it would sabotage the talks, Netanyahu ordered a series of airstrikes on Lebanon&rsquo;s capital Beirut. For weeks, Iranian leaders have said airstrikes on Beirut were a red line. Sure enough, Tehran started lobbing missiles toward Israel for the first time since the U.S.-Iranian ceasefire two months ago.
At that point, Donald Trump told the Axios website that &ldquo;I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate.&rdquo;
Yeah, &ldquo;Bibi&rdquo; retaliated anyway. But remember, Trump calls all the shots.
➢ Recovered history: When Netanyahu first became prime minister in 1996, he paid a call on President Bill Clinton in Washington. According to veteran diplomat Aaron David Miller&rsquo;s 2008 book The Much Too Promised Land, Netanyahu was so overbearing that after the meeting, Clinton groused to his aides, &ldquo;Who&rsquo;s the f***ing superpower here?&rdquo; <img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3DyeqpoGnWvZbq1OsgkuGg/99c5e3c0e8e5b8a1d0f19120611b3be4/geiger_x.png" alt="X Screenshot" />
For the moment, however, both Tel Aviv and Tehran say they&rsquo;re holding off on further attacks &mdash; and U.S. crude futures have retreated to $91.41.
As usual, rising oil prices translate to rising inflation expectations, which translates to rising Treasury yields. The 10-year T-note is back over 4.55% &mdash; up meaningfully from 4.45% at the end of May.
Today is Day 101 of the war. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed.
[Program note: The war and its market impact were a major topic &mdash; but hardly the only one &mdash; discussed last Thursday at Paradigm&rsquo;s &ldquo;America 76/26&rdquo; event featuring Jim Rickards and his team.
During a wide-ranging three-hour discussion, Jim and the analysts put out 53 (!) stocks and ETFs for your consideration. If you missed the livestream from Philadelphia, <a href="https://paradigmpresslive.com/America7626" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the replay is still available for viewing at this link</a>.]
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Comic Relief
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />This one&rsquo;s been making the rounds throughout corporate America&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/7xZMVQnh56A03g6gMcr5IM/4b136e0421c4bc680fc50d16a313245f/plank_meme.png" alt="Meme" />
That one guy on the left seriously needs to work on his form. Just sayin&rsquo;...
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Florida&rsquo;s Property Tax Proposal
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;Note there are two parts to this amendment,&rdquo; says the first of several thoughtful emails we got from Floridians about <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/elon-failure-is-always-an-option/#3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a referendum that would slash property taxes for millions.</a>
&ldquo;One is the potential increase on the homestead exemption from $50K now to $150K in 2027, $250K in 2028 and then as adjusted by the legislature in following years with proviso in the meantime for CPI increases. The latter would have been welcomed years back but never instituted. The exemption for schools is not affected.
&ldquo;The other part is to limit property tax to the &lsquo;rollback&rsquo; rate and limit what can be used for the property taxes collected to &lsquo;essentials&rsquo; such as police, fire, water and sewage, infrastructure maintenance and ???. What are essential? (Rollback rate is the rate which based on the certified property appraiser rolls current assessed property values equals the same $$ collected previous fiscal year).
&ldquo;Are programs for families and elderly such as recreational courses, pools, adult daycare to be not essential and thus property tax money may not be used for them?
&ldquo;Can other &lsquo;fees&rsquo; be used &mdash; and this is where the discussion from the legislators is NO.
&ldquo;How about those rural or smaller municipalities that 80&ndash;90%-plus of their income to support a balanced budget is going to be impacted severely &mdash; will there be grants for the state? If so, those grants will have conditions, and how will this go over on their constituents?
&ldquo;Great idea but short on solid study showing impact and options.
&ldquo;Short-term fix that may lead to long-term repercussions.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;The proposal was watered down by the legislature &mdash; &lsquo;Don&rsquo;t touch education money!&rsquo; (gotta protect those teacher unions),&rdquo; another reader points out.
&ldquo;So the proposal means that in 2027 a five-year-plus homeowner in Florida will get a $150,000 reduction in their property value for the 40&ndash;50% of their property taxes that have nothing to do with education.
&ldquo;In 2028, that reduction would go to $250,000.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a step in the right direction, but it&rsquo;s not what Gov. DeSantis was requesting. The legislature is beholden to the schools and counties and not the citizens (despite declining student enrollment). Tax revenue has grown by many multiples of inflation and the government keeps growing to gobble it up.
&ldquo;Fiscal responsibility and taxpayer empathy don&rsquo;t exist even in &lsquo;the Free State of Florida,&rsquo; at least not at the county level.
&ldquo;It will likely go down in defeat because there will be nonstop bleating, &lsquo;What about the children?!&rsquo; (Who are completely unaffected by the property tax proposal, but it helps to raise the hysteria). And veiled threats to increase county fees to make up the difference, despite state assurances that they will not allow the counties to do that.
&ldquo;Counties won&rsquo;t tighten their belts, they&rsquo;ll just raise fees to make up for any revenue loss. The public sector never has layoffs at the state or local levels. State and local governments always grow, but never shrink.
&ldquo;Sorry, I&rsquo;ve seen this cheerleading for tax cuts and seen time and again how our &lsquo;representatives&rsquo; and government administrators cannot ever be fiscally responsible; there just isn&rsquo;t sufficient accountability because of a complicit or braindead press, term limits on reformers, a purposely uninformed populace (see former statement about the press) and greed/kingdom-building mentality of the government managers who just wait out the term-limited reformers like DeSantis.
&ldquo;Hope springs eternal, but we are dealing with a society that is prone to mass hysteria. Remember Covid and Trump Derangement Syndrome.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;The tax reduction will only apply to homesteaded Florida residences, which only account for 7% of all taxes across the state, not 75%,&rdquo; says a second-generation Floridian.
&ldquo;Commercial, rental and business properties will not be included. I look forward to voting FOR this amendment on Nov. 3 and finally getting closer to actually owning my home.&rdquo;
Dave responds: Cursory research aided by AI shows primary residences account for about 27% of local property tax revenue in Florida, not 7% &mdash; but you raise an important point of clarification, and I thank you. I should have given that number from the Tax Foundation more scrutiny.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;This is a great idea for seniors and those on fixed incomes, especially if they paid off their houses,&rdquo; says our final correspondent.
&ldquo;Development frenzy has doubled and tripled tax bases in some areas (like Tampa), but you have to understand those taxes don't pay for the community developments &mdash; bonds attached to property deeds do. So where does the tax money go?
&ldquo;It's a tough issue. I would personally benefit from this, but I can see where smaller, rural areas would be hurt and the tax shift would be real. Florida has no income tax, and most cities do not levy city tax, so all of a sudden we might see 15% sales tax in some areas. Where does my no-state-income tax benefit go if my other taxes go up so high?
&ldquo;You don't get somethin&rsquo; for nothin&rsquo;.&rdquo;
Dave: And on that note, you get the last word! Thanks to everyone who wrote in. More feedback tomorrow&hellip;

fmf hero 060826

The Problem With the SpaceX IPO

FMF-Issue-06.01.26-featured

[2026 UPDATE] Echoes From Hell

FMF-Issue-052826-Featured

The Yamanaka Secret

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />SpaceX Is Not a Space Company
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> From Paradigm&rsquo;s lips to CNBC&rsquo;s ears&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3S0YwtrZLajRpu299eolGF/b475cb41e67633f7c8f7d0b0c6d996aa/FMF-Issue-052726-1.jpg" alt="Unsual_Whales Tweet" width="540px" />
Way back in January, colleague Davis Wilson at our sister e-letter The Million Mission <a href="https://million-mission.com/posts/ticker-symbol-elon-coming-soon?vid2=f7584bb8d0f8b4ef03ea4a2a79cb9ffebd5601637dfb4b221b21055bfe10aa56fb9565c7166c12ea93687031263ed97489aead8f437e4ddd1cfcbcd5e6a6bb06&amp;utm_campaign=FMF_Issue_02.03.26_&amp;utm_source=Iterable&amp;itbl_templateId=21797526&amp;itbl_campaignId=16746037&amp;utm_medium=Email">mused</a> about just this possibility: &ldquo;What if Elon Musk eventually consolidates all of his companies into one mega-entity?&rdquo;
Days later, Musk took an initial step in that direction &mdash; bringing his xAI artificial-intelligence venture under the SpaceX umbrella.
For the moment, a SpaceX-Tesla tie-up remains in the realm of speculation. And so we&rsquo;ll keep the focus today on what we know &mdash; and there&rsquo;s a lot to know in the prospectus SpaceX filed with the feds last week ahead of going public 17 days from now.
In yesterday&rsquo;s edition, our tech-investing pro Ray Blanco spotlighted the standout number in that document: SpaceX sees AI as a $26.5 trillion market, compared with a paltry $370 billion for space.
Today Davis Wilson shares his own insights after pulling apart SpaceX&rsquo;s S-1 document&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> It&rsquo;s not just that SpaceX sees AI as a vastly bigger market than space: It&rsquo;s also the fact SpaceX is spending its precious capital accordingly.
&ldquo;For the three months ended March 31, 2026,&rdquo; says Davis, &ldquo;SpaceX spent:
<ul>
<li>$1.05 billion expanding its Space segment</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>$1.33 billion on Connectivity (Starlink)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>And a shocking $7.72 billion building AI infrastructure.</li>
</ul>
&ldquo;That means SpaceX is currently spending roughly 7X more on AI than its actual space operations.
&ldquo;This completely changes the narrative around the company.
&ldquo;Most investors still think rockets are the main story. The S-1 strongly suggests AI increasingly is.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> All that spending would be impossible without Starlink. &ldquo;Rockets and AI generate the headlines &mdash; but Starlink generates the cash flow,&rdquo; says Davis.
The &ldquo;Connectivity&rdquo; division of SpaceX &mdash; dominated by Starlink &mdash; generated $7.2 billion last year in adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization).
&ldquo;Meanwhile,&rdquo; Davis tells us, &ldquo;SpaceX&rsquo;s Space segment lost $657 million in 2025, while its AI segment lost $6.4 billion.
&ldquo;In other words, Starlink is increasingly funding the rest of Elon Musk&rsquo;s empire.&rdquo; As such, Davis thinks &ldquo;Starlink may ultimately be the most important business inside SpaceX.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Meanwhile, the integration between SpaceX and Tesla is already tighter than you might think.
Davis unearthed the following from SpaceX&rsquo;s filing&hellip;
<ul>
<li>&ldquo;Tesla owns 18,990,195 shares of SpaceX Class A common stock</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>SpaceX obtained goods and services from Tesla of $11 million in 2023, $4 million in 2024 and $144 million in 2025</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>xAI obtained goods and services from Tesla of $191 million in 2024 and $506 million in 2025</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Tesla has directly and indirectly purchased advertising on SpaceX&rsquo;s X platform</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Even the cost of Elon&rsquo;s jet usage is split between SpaceX and Tesla.</li>
</ul>
&ldquo;The lines between these companies are becoming increasingly blurred,&rdquo; says Davis &mdash; making that mega-merger more and more plausible. &ldquo;Maybe one day my prediction will come true &mdash; Ticker Symbol: ELON.&rdquo;
Davis is on the fence about whether he&rsquo;ll actually buy once SpaceX starts trading June 12 as SPCX.
&ldquo;But at the very least,&rdquo; he says, &ldquo;I now understand what I&rsquo;d actually be buying.
&ldquo;And no&hellip; regardless of what most people think, it isn&rsquo;t a rocket company.&rdquo;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />Here We Go Again (Again)
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> All evidence to the contrary, the &ldquo;war&rsquo;s almost over&rdquo; trade is in play for a second straight day.
At last check, U.S. oil futures are down over 4% at $90 on the nose. That&rsquo;s even though there&rsquo;s still no &ldquo;deal&rdquo; between Washington and Tehran that would bring the Iran war to a conclusion.
Even if the two sides can somehow come to terms on uranium and the Strait of Hormuz, Tehran wants Israel to stop bombing Lebanon &mdash; and there&rsquo;s no sign Israel is willing to let up. (Remember when Donald Trump &ldquo;forbade&rdquo; Israel to attack Lebanon last month?)
And so shipping through the strait remains at a trickle relative to when Washington and Tel Aviv launched the war three months ago.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4NWxWnoTSEaZlipaUUGkQd/49a35cd3f8e9dd38bde14a240cfc2314/FMF-Issue-052726-2.jpg" alt="pub" width="540px" />
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Meanwhile, the major U.S. stock indexes are taking a breather &mdash; the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq down fractionally from yesterday&rsquo;s record closes.
Paradigm readers are savoring a handful of gains racked up by the editors just yesterday&hellip;
<ul>
<li>Greg Guenthner&rsquo;s Trading Desk readers collected 435% in just over a month playing call options on the red-hot space name Redwire</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>It took less than three months for Altucher&rsquo;s Investment Network readers to collect 140% on the chipmaker Astera Labs</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Microcap Millionaire readers bagged 382% in less than a year on Navitas Semiconductor</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Chris Cimorelli&rsquo;s 10X Trade Club readers pulled in 123% in less than four months with call options on Enphase Energy.</li>
</ul>
Precious metals are getting clobbered again despite the &ldquo;war&rsquo;s almost over&rdquo; atmosphere. Gold is down $64 to $4,442, a two-month low. And silver&rsquo;s off more than two bucks, retesting its May lows at $74.63.
Crypto remains stuck in the mud, Bitcoin under $75,000 and Ethereum at $2,060.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />AI Regulation Rethink
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> For the record: The Trump administration is pulling back on its plans for heavy-handed AI regulation.
Earlier this month we told you how the White House&rsquo;s thinking underwent a major transformation since last year: Gone was the president&rsquo;s talk about how AI is too important to burden &ldquo;with foolish rules and even stupid rules.&rdquo; Instead, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett started talking about AI being regulated &ldquo;just like an FDA drug.&rdquo;
Your editor was <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/ai-speeding-toward-a-brick-wall">appalled</a> at the prospect. The FDA is the last thing that comes to mind when you think about innovation and competitiveness.
But last Thursday, at nearly the last minute&hellip; Donald Trump called off a signing ceremony for an AI executive order that had been in the works for weeks.
As he explained it, he doesn&rsquo;t want to get in the way of the American AI industry&rsquo;s advantages over China.
&ldquo;I really thought that could have been a blocker, and I want to make sure it&rsquo;s not&hellip; I don&rsquo;t want to do anything that will get in the way of that lead.&rdquo;
It appears David Sacks still holds sway in this administration even though he&rsquo;s stepped back from his role as the White House AI and crypto czar.
Sacks stands for the hands-off approach that was the administration&rsquo;s stance last year. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a very visceral negative reaction here because we know how damaging that would be to innovation,&rdquo; he said recently on the All In podcast that he co-hosts.
As it happens, Sacks still has a voice within the White House as co-chair of the President&rsquo;s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
One wonders if Sacks has been getting input from Elon Musk now that it turns out SpaceX is mostly an AI company: Both men belonged to the original &ldquo;PayPal mafia&rdquo; during the 1990s&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Your Bank Won&rsquo;t Ask for Your Passport After All
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> OK, it looks as if you won&rsquo;t have to present your U.S. passport just to open a bank account.
Three months ago <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/your-bank-wants-your-passport">we sounded the alarm</a> as the Trump administration was poised to issue a sweeping executive order forcing banks to collect information about their customers&rsquo; citizenship status.
In theory it was aimed at cracking down on illegal migration. In practice it was a huge step toward a show-me-your-papers society for law-abiding citizens. You would have had to cough up a passport or birth certificate not only to open a new bank account, but even to keep your existing one.
It appears the White House has dialed back on the proposal. Not because of pressure from the public &mdash; but rather pressure from the banking industry, which blanched at the new paperwork requirements.
The final executive order, issued last week, merely directs banks to &ldquo;make a person&rsquo;s immigration status an explicit part of a bank&rsquo;s assessment of whether a customer poses a money-laundering risk,&rdquo; according to The Wall Street Journal.
Clear as mud, right?
At least we know this much: Unlike the original proposal, whatever enforcement takes place won&rsquo;t be visible to the customer.
Well, unless the bank decides you &ldquo;pose a money-laundering risk&rdquo; and closes your account.
Which is a potentially greater risk than you might think.
Under previous instances of unclear federal mandates, JPMorgan Chase shut down everyone from porn starlets to gun-shop owners to crypto bros.
It could easily start happening again &mdash; and all because the U.S. government can&rsquo;t keep track of who&rsquo;s in the country legally and who&rsquo;s not.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Intergenerational Warfare
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Dave, I don&rsquo;t think it is an &lsquo;I got mine&rsquo; philosophy,&rdquo; a reader writes on the subject of boomer attitudes toward younger generations. &ldquo;I believe it&rsquo;s more that we see the waste in the name of equality.
&ldquo;Government establishes student loans for everyone. It lowers standards and provides loans that have no bearing with what the degree will produce, e.g. $200,000 in loans for a job that won&rsquo;t earn the student $50,000.
&ldquo;Schools lower entrance standards in the name of fairness, knowing full well the student will not make it past the first year. This extra money is gravy for them. It doesn&rsquo;t cost much to carry a student that will flunk out the first year.
&ldquo;So what do they do? Build more extravagant buildings that aren&rsquo;t really needed. Add extra courses in new disciplines to attract more students that will suffer. Add more administrative staff and cut back on the quality of teaching staff. That makes the degree weaker, resulting in lower ranking for the programs.
&ldquo;Students suffer and are behind the eight ball if they even make it to graduation.
&ldquo;I went to a smaller university ranked No. 3 nationally in engineering. The total expenses including food and housing for the four years were approximately $15,000 per year. Starting salaries for graduates were approximately $9,000 per year. That&rsquo;s 60% of the total expenses.
&ldquo;The ratio is now 20% for engineering grads and their ranking in engineering is No. 53. But they added many liberal arts programs in order to diversify the student body. They also spent $200 million on a performing arts theater for the 30 or so music majors. God knows what the ratio is for music majors.
&ldquo;A few ideas:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li>Make universities liable for a majority of student defaults. They knew the loans wouldn&rsquo;t be paid</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Limit total loans to two years of average starting salary for their planned degree. Annual loans would be limited to a percentage based on the number of credits scheduled. If a student plans on a six-year program, they are limited to 1/6th of the loan total per year. No front-end loading.</li>
</ul>
&ldquo;I know these ideas are unrealistic for a government that can handle its own finances, but I do believe it is what makes us boomers cynical about people not handling their own finances with student loans, credit card debt, etc. They are just used to low interest money being available with no regard to how they will pay it back.&rdquo;
Dave responds: So you raise many valid points about how government intervention has messed up higher education&hellip; but then you put the responsibility on the students?
We now have two generations of Americans for whom it was impossible to pay for college by flipping pizzas part time &mdash; but they were also told they&rsquo;d be condemned to a life of penury if they didn&rsquo;t get the sheepskin.
All they did was respond to the incentives, perverse as the incentives were. And that&rsquo;s on them?
The simplest fix &mdash; not a panacea, but a good start &mdash; would be to make student loans dischargeable in bankruptcy again. They were until 2005 &mdash; until Joe Biden shepherded the change through the Senate and George W. Bush signed it into law. Bipartisanship!

FMF-Issue-052726-Featured

SpaceX Is Not a Space Company

FMF-Issue-052626-Featured

SpaceX’s Halo

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />Musk&rsquo;s Biggest Ambition
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> The sooner this technology is perfected, the sooner the societal stress over data centers is dampened.
For over six months now, we&rsquo;ve been waxing enthusiastic in these pages about the potential for data centers in space &mdash; delivering the AI &ldquo;compute&rdquo; the world demands with 24/7 solar power.
Data centers in space won&rsquo;t compete for scarce electricity with existing homes and businesses. They won&rsquo;t suck up prodigious amounts of water for cooling. They won&rsquo;t generate noise that keeps neighbors up at night.
The existing power grid simply can&rsquo;t accommodate the current buildout of data centers. Something&rsquo;s gotta give.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Data centers already eat electricity like a small country. And AI adoption isn't slowing down. It's going vertical,&rdquo; affirms Paradigm AI authority James Altucher.
In yesterday&rsquo;s Altucher Confidential, James said energy is the single biggest constraint on AI &mdash; and whoever solves the energy problem wins the AI race. Not whoever has the smartest model or the most sophisticated chips.
&ldquo;You can build the most powerful artificial intelligence the world has ever seen. Give it a name and a personality. And it will sit there doing absolutely nothing &mdash; because you can't plug it in&hellip;
&ldquo;The grid we have was not built for this. It was built for air conditioners and refrigerators and the occasional Christmas display. It was never built to run a digital civilization.&rdquo;
But data centers in space? They can be purpose-built to meet all their own power demands.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;If even part of AI compute moves up there, we're looking at a brand-new layer of infrastructure underneath the entire economy,&rdquo; James goes on. &ldquo;The way railroads were a layer. The way the internet was a layer.&rdquo;
As we&rsquo;ve chronicled since last fall, Elon Musk is the biggest enthusiast of orbiting data centers. And James says Musk has put a number on their economic potential.
$1 quadrillion. With a Q. That&rsquo;s 1 followed by 15 zeroes. A thousand trillion.
To be clear, James is extrapolating from something Musk said at Tesla&rsquo;s most recent shareholder meeting.
&ldquo;Elon said AI and robotics could grow the global economy &lsquo;by a factor of 10 or maybe 100.&rsquo; Run the low end against world GDP and you land on $1 quadrillion.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;And here's why Elon can say it with a straight face: This doesn't apply to one product. It applies to everything he is building,&rdquo; James goes on.
&ldquo;The robotaxi network. The Optimus humanoid robots. Grok, and whatever comes after Grok. Every one of those runs on compute. And compute runs on power.
&ldquo;So the real bottleneck across his entire empire is power. Always power. Solve power, and you don't improve one product &mdash; you unlock all of them at once.&rdquo;
Really, energy is Musk&rsquo;s biggest ambition. Because everything else stems from that.
Musk is keenly aware of all this as he prepares for SpaceX&rsquo;s IPO on Friday, June 12. Remember that his xAI venture and the Starlink satellite network both operate under the SpaceX umbrella. Energy is key to all of it.
&ldquo;He's taking an entire ecosystem public,&rdquo; says James. &ldquo;And if you've watched Elon operate for 20 years, you know exactly what he does next. When something is critical to his plans, he does not politely wait for the market to hand it to him. He buys it. He partners with it. Or he pulls it inside the tent.
&ldquo;He did it before. He'll do it again.&rdquo;
With that in mind, James has been digging into one small company that&rsquo;s key to Musk&rsquo;s ambitions.
&ldquo;It already works with SpaceX. It already has real, functioning technology in orbit &mdash; today. It&rsquo;s NOT a household name. You've never seen it on CNBC. Most professional investors couldn't tell you what it does. But it is sitting on precisely the kind of technology a man building a trillion-dollar AI empire cannot afford to be without.&rdquo;
If you&rsquo;re a Microcap Millionaire subscriber, you&rsquo;re already hip to what James is talking about.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />$6 Gasoline
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> The national average gasoline price sits at $4.56 a gallon, according to AAA &mdash; and Paradigm natural resources pro Matt Badiali says $6 is in view this summer.
&ldquo;The only good news is that high prices cure themselves,&rdquo; he wrote for yesterday&rsquo;s Daily Reckoning. &ldquo;It just takes pain and time.&rdquo;
Matt sees parallels between the present moment and the summer of 2008 &mdash; the first time gas prices eclipsed $4 a gallon.
&ldquo;We stopped driving and conserved when we could,&rdquo; he recalls. &ldquo;We carpooled. When we went out to run errands, we ran ALL of them at once. And we changed our plans to accommodate the extra expenses.&rdquo;
Result: Fuel consumption fell 21.5% between December 2007&ndash;May 2009. (OK, it helped that millions of people were thrown out of work in the &ldquo;Great Recession&rdquo; and had nowhere to commute. But you get the point.)
And that $4 gas in the summer of 2008? It was well under $2 by early 2009.
&ldquo;The price fell off so much, so quickly because at the time, 60% of the demand for oil came from personal automobiles,&rdquo; says Matt. &ldquo;And if we all stop driving, there&rsquo;s plenty of oil again.
&ldquo;Today, light-duty vehicles (cars, SUVs and motorcycles) use 52&ndash;60% of U.S. oil demand. That means personal vehicles still have a major impact on demand. And when driving becomes a luxury, a huge swath of the country will conserve.&rdquo;
By the way, that $4 a gallon in 2008 translates to $6.34 today. With the Strait of Hormuz still all but closed, Matt thinks we&rsquo;re on our way there. &ldquo;All over the world, governments are burning through strategic oil reserves. The reality is about to come crashing home this summer.&rdquo;
You can offset those high prices with gains in your portfolio. Matt says you can consider the United States Gasoline Fund (UGA) &mdash; an ETF that tracks the gasoline price via options. Or the VanEck Oil Refiners (CRAK). Refiners have to grapple with rising oil prices, yes, but they still sport handsome margins.
[Dave&rsquo;s disclosure: I own a small position in CRAK.]
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Meanwhile, In the short term, U.S. oil futures are sinking big-time &mdash; down over 6% and back below $98 for the first time in over a week.
Supposedly that&rsquo;s because Donald Trump says U.S.-Iran talks are in their &ldquo;final stages.&rdquo; (Gee, where&rsquo;ve we heard that before? And were there suspicious trades ahead of that remark?)
From everything we see, the Iranian side is signaling that no talks will take place while the annual Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca is underway. If so, that means nothing happens until after May 30.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> As Nvidia goes, so goes the whole stock market? Kinda feels like it.
Nvidia reports its quarterly numbers after the closing bell today. NVDA isn&rsquo;t just the biggest company in the world. It&rsquo;s a bellwether for chip stocks. Lately, chip stocks have been a bellwether for the tech sector. And tech has been a bellwether for the whole market.
All of these things touched record highs last Thursday &mdash; only to hit an air pocket since. The reaction to Nvidia might well set the tone for everything else in the coming days.
And what will drive the reaction? Davis Wilson at our sister e-letter The Million Mission says investors want to know three things&hellip;
<ul>
<li>&ldquo;Does the AI investment boom still have legs?</li>
<li>&ldquo;Can Nvidia maintain its dominant position as competition ramps up?</li>
<li>&ldquo;Any updates on selling chips to China following CEO Jensen Huang&rsquo;s recent Beijing summit alongside President Trump?</li>
</ul>
&ldquo;Tonight&rsquo;s earnings call will set the tone for the entire AI market heading into the second half of the year.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> In the meantime, the broad market is in the green today on the aforementioned &ldquo;war&rsquo;s almost over again&rdquo; trade.
The S&amp;P 500 is up nearly 1% to 7,422. The gains in the Dow and the Nasdaq are even stronger.
Likewise bonds are rallying, sending yields down &mdash; the 10-year Treasury note at 4.58% and the 30-year bond at 5.12%. (Those levels are still very high by recent standards.)
Precious metals are licking their wounds, gold back over $4,500 and silver approaching $76. Crypto is also staging a modest rally with Bitcoin back over $77,000 and Ethereum above $2,100.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />About Those Retail Sales&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> We don&rsquo;t have a lot of economic data points this week &mdash; so it&rsquo;s worth stepping back to examine the bigger picture when it comes to one of the most-reported numbers out there.
We mention the retail sales figures each month. Frequently we mention how they&rsquo;re not adjusted for inflation.
So what would you see if they were adjusted for inflation? The folks at Statista did just that this week.
&ldquo;Between April 2021 and April 2026,&rdquo; writes Statista&rsquo;s Felix Richter, &ldquo;monthly retail and food services sales (adjusted for seasonal variations, holiday and trading day differences) increased by 24.3%.
&ldquo;While that sounds like the economy must be humming along nicely, sales were essentially flat when adjusted for inflation.&rdquo;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/rz8AKPi3ALKeFx8IwICqu/f6b721c114358ebf10f0b6d26f4b63b5/FMF-Issue-052026-1.jpg" alt="Real Retail Sales" width="540px" />
&ldquo;From a positive perspective,&rdquo; he continues, &ldquo;that means that Americans haven&rsquo;t really cut back on their purchases despite the financial pain that inflation has inflicted on many households.
&ldquo;From a more negative viewpoint, it means that Americans are spending (a lot) more to keep the same living standard, which is not just bad for consumers but also for retailers trying to actually grow sales.&rdquo;
Worse, over the last five years wages haven&rsquo;t kept pace with the official inflation rate. Wages almost caught up with prices as the calendar flipped from 2025 to 2026 &mdash; but then came the Trump-Netanyahu &ldquo;excursion&rdquo; into Iran and once again price increases are running away from wage increases.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Worse still, the official inflation rate understates your real increase in the cost of living. 
Maybe you already know that intuitively&hellip; but we should emphasize this point more often: Federal statisticians have been monkeying with the inflation numbers for decades to make them seem better than they really are.
Here are the two major techniques, with supporting examples&hellip;
<ul>
<li>Hedonic adjustments. If the price of a new car goes up, but the manufacturers add new features to the new models, well then the price of a new car hasn&rsquo;t really gone up, has it?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Substitution. If you start buying hamburger because steak is too expensive, well, your price of beef hasn&rsquo;t really gone up, has it?</li>
</ul>
Seriously, this is how government statisticians think.
Result: In mid-2023 the official inflation rate was about 4%. But economist John Williams at Shadow Government Statistics runs the numbers the same way the feds did in the 1970s &mdash; and by that yardstick inflation was running at a 12% clip.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Comic Relief
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> As long as we&rsquo;ve had AI and resistance to AI on the brain in recent days&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/37Jyc5WD1lqIWYByHKYoSV/b0d009b56dd93a35e81965b6b36757ee/FMF-Issue-052026-2.jpg" alt="Comedy Relief" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: AI Data Centers, Again
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Dave, I can't be the only reader who is on the fence about these AI data centers,&rdquo; a reader writes as we continue to get feedback from <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/backlash-data-centers">last Friday&rsquo;s edition</a>.
&ldquo;Your writers have made it abundantly clear that they will gobble up enormous amounts of power and water. It's the &lsquo;jobs' part of the equation that seems to be missing? I can assume there would be quite a few construction jobs as these huge warehouses are erected and they will need enormous HVAC and power switching systems.
&ldquo;BUT what happens after they're built? Just a couple of guys waiting around for things to break down? Or is there a real need for the technically savvy to be inside testing, running, repairing and what not?
&ldquo;So will they create 100/200/500/1,000 jobs after commencing operations or are they just great big power-sucking empty warehouses?&rdquo;
Dave responds: Well, let&rsquo;s return to Maine &mdash; the first state where a moratorium on data center construction reached the governor&rsquo;s desk.
As we mentioned at the end of April, Gov. Janet Mills vetoed the bill because there was no carve-out for a data center already under construction in the town of Jay. She said it would bring 800 temporary jobs and 100 permanent ones.
Presumably that 8:1 ratio is consistent regardless of the project size?
We&rsquo;ll leave it there for today &mdash; except to note that the largest headline on the front page of today&rsquo;s Wall Street Journal is: &ldquo;Americans&rsquo; AI Rebellion Grows, Fed by Energy Costs, Job Losses.&rdquo;
Hey, you heard it here first!

FMF-Issue-052026-Featured

Musk’s Biggest Ambition

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />All the Choices Are Bad
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> When it comes to the Iran war, &ldquo;Trump has no good options,&rdquo; Jim Rickards wrote his Strategic Intelligence subscribers yesterday morning.
Later in the day, as if to reinforce the point, Trump announced he was postponing a &ldquo;scheduled attack of Iran&rdquo; that was supposed to start today.
He said he did so in response to a request from the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. For whatever it&rsquo;s worth, The Wall Street Journal says &ldquo;several Gulf officials from some of the countries Trump mentioned said they were not aware of the imminent plan to attack Iran he described.&rdquo;
Even before Trump&rsquo;s announcement, one financial-minded wag on X said there was no way an attack would take place today. Or tomorrow.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/1whjndDufJojuOzaY4stCD/d51f834dad0ad3c9dd17ac6e0844f963/FMF-Issue-051926-1.jpg" alt="JustDario Tweet" width="540px" />
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;At this point, it&rsquo;s apparent that Iran has gained the upper hand in its conflict with the U.S. and Israel in the Persian Gulf and the wider Middle East,&rdquo; Jim Rickards elaborates.
&ldquo;Trump has no clear plan for victory and no easy way out without risking the appearance of defeat.&rdquo;
It was Jim who warned us in early March that the U.S. military lacks the defensive and offensive missiles to wage a sustained campaign against Iran; the corporate media caught up with his assessment only a few days ago.
Call him a panican if you insist. But Jim&rsquo;s pro-Trump credentials are second to none. He still has contacts in the intelligence community from his days working with the CIA to track terrorist financing. If the trajectory of events is going poorly now, he&rsquo;s not afraid to level with his readers.
&ldquo;Trump has not achieved regime change,&rdquo; Jim continues. &ldquo;He has not secured the removal of Iran&rsquo;s highly enriched uranium stockpiles. If anything, the conflict has unified the Iranian people rather than divided them.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively disrupted by the ongoing military standoff involving Iran and U.S. naval forces. Oil flows have been severely affected since late February.
&ldquo;The impact is not limited to the United States or the Persian Gulf. Japan, South Korea, China and parts of Europe depend heavily on energy shipments moving through the strait&hellip;
&ldquo;The only way to accomplish the goals of seizing uranium, forcing regime change and fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz would be a large-scale invasion backed by overwhelming air power.
&ldquo;If Trump chooses that route, he risks an escalation path similar to the one the U.S. experienced in Vietnam from 1965&ndash;1975.&rdquo;
And that&rsquo;s if such an undertaking is even possible. If you mustered every active combat division in the Army and Marine Corps, you&rsquo;d have about 175,000 troops. That&rsquo;s roughly the same number deployed at the peak of the Iraq War in 2007 &mdash; and Iraq is a quarter the size of Iran.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Meanwhile, why does the economic impact remain relatively muted (apart from, of course, higher fuel prices)?
The most dire forecasts of impacts overseas haven&rsquo;t come to pass. As Jim Rickards points out, &ldquo;The lights are still on in South Korea. Manufacturing plants are still humming in Japan. And U.S. stock markets are at or near all-time highs.&rdquo;
But Jim says rest assured the crisis is coming.
&ldquo;There are several reasons the crisis has not yet hit the global economy apart from the obvious impact of higher energy prices. First, a large volume of oil and liquid natural gas had already been shipped before the conflict escalated and was already at sea outside the Persian Gulf. Those shipments took four&ndash;eight weeks to reach their destinations, creating what amounted to a floating pipeline of energy supplies.
&ldquo;That cushion is now disappearing. The last vessels from the earlier shipping cycle are reaching ports, and replacement cargoes are limited.
&ldquo;After that, countries can draw down petroleum and natural gas held in storage, including strategic petroleum reserves. But those reserves are finite and difficult to refill under current conditions.&rdquo;
Meanwhile, &ldquo;fertilizer shortages could disrupt the spring planting season in the Northern Hemisphere. Helium shortages may begin constraining semiconductor production. And oil and natural gas shortages could hit Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and China particularly hard in the coming weeks.
&ldquo;The crisis is not over. In fact, it may barely be beginning.&rdquo;
In the meantime, however, U.S. oil futures are up nearly two bucks in the last 24 hours &mdash; $108.67 as we check our screens, the highest all month.
[Special message from Jim Rickards: &ldquo;On Thursday, June 4, at 2:00 p.m. ET, my team and I will broadcast a free LIVE summit from Philadelphia &mdash; the birthplace of the American experiment.
&ldquo;We&rsquo;ll break down what&rsquo;s really driving markets in 2026, including the Iran war and energy shock, the growing stress in private credit, inflation, the affordability crisis, critical minerals, gold, AI-driven power shortages and the future of the Trump agenda.
&ldquo;Joining me will be Dan Amoss, Byron King, Zach Scheidt, Matt Badiali, Adam Sharp and other trusted colleagues as we share our latest research, investment ideas and market outlook.
&ldquo;We&rsquo;ll also reveal select Strategic Intelligence stock picks LIVE during the broadcast.
&ldquo;This won&rsquo;t be a dry economics lecture. Expect fast-moving conversation, lively debate, behind-the-scenes stories and practical insights you can use immediately.
&ldquo;There&rsquo;s absolutely no cost to attend and no credit card required.&rdquo;
More details coming from Jim in the days ahead, but for now save the date: Thursday June 4.]
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />SpaceX Needs More Revenue
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Interesting timing here. Just as SpaceX gears up for the largest IPO in history, Starlink is quietly raising prices across several plans,&rdquo; says colleague Davis Wilson.
As mentioned in yesterday&rsquo;s 5 Bullets, SpaceX&rsquo;s IPO date is now set: Friday June 12, launching under the ticker SPCX.
And events are moving fast and furious. Regardless of the data plan, Starlink customers are seeing price increases of $5&ndash;10 a month.
&ldquo;Once a company prepares to go public,&rdquo; says Davis, &ldquo;Wall Street starts focusing intensely on revenue and earnings. Starlink is increasingly being positioned as the recurring cash flow engine helping justify SpaceX&rsquo;s reported $1.75 trillion valuation.&rdquo;
Maybe the analogy here is Apple. The hardware like the iPhone gets all the headlines &mdash; but AAPL is a subscription-revenue machine between the App Store, iCloud and Apple Music. Starlink performs the same function for SpaceX even as Falcon and Starship launches grab all the attention.
Thing is, &ldquo;competition is coming,&rdquo; Davis says. &ldquo;Amazon is rapidly building out Leo, which aims to compete directly with Starlink in satellite internet.
&ldquo;Right now, Starlink clearly has the lead. But the satellite internet race is just beginning, and pricing power could become much more important once serious competition enters the market.&rdquo;
As for the bigger picture, Davis cautions that &ldquo;massive IPOs often stumble out of the gate, even when the underlying company becomes wildly successful.&rdquo;
No one remembers now&hellip; but Facebook took a 40% spill after going public in 2012.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> As was the case Friday and yesterday&hellip; high oil prices are fueling inflation expectations, which are driving Treasury yields higher.
At last check the 10-year T-note is up to 4.67% &mdash; the highest since early 2025. And the 30-year T-bond is up to 5.18% &mdash; another level last seen in 2007.
Unlike yesterday, the bond market jitters are spilling into the stock market &mdash; the S&amp;P 500 down two-thirds of a percent at 7,355 and the Nasdaq down 1%, breaking decisively below 26,000. The Dow is holding up somewhat better.
Also unlike yesterday, precious metals are selling off again &mdash; gold breaking below $4,500 for the first time since late March and silver approaching $74.
Crypto is holding its own compared with 24 hours ago &mdash; Bitcoin at $76,570 and Ethereum just over $2,100.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Data Centers and Electric Costs, Continued
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Data centers drove up wholesale power prices 75.5% during the first quarter of this year for the country&rsquo;s biggest grid operator.
PJM Interconnection serves 67 million customers in 13 states including Virginia, home to &ldquo;Data Center Alley&rdquo; in Loudoun County.
The 75.5% figure comes from a report issued by Monitoring Analytics, the independent market monitor for PJM.
&ldquo;Data center load growth is the primary reason for recent and expected capacity market conditions, including total forecast load growth, the tight supply and demand balance and high prices,&rdquo; says the report. &ldquo;But for data center growth, both actual and forecast, the capacity market would not have seen the same tight supply demand conditions.&rdquo;
Looking ahead, &ldquo;the price impacts on customers have been very large and are not reversible,&rdquo; the report goes on. &ldquo;The price impacts will be even larger in the near term unless the issues associated with data center load are addressed in a timely manner.&rdquo;
The report says the only practical solution is for data centers to supply their own power, not connected to the grid.
&ldquo;This broad bring-your-own new generation solution to the issues created by the addition of unprecedented amounts of large data center load does not require a continued massive wealth transfer through ongoing shortage pricing,&rdquo;
Clearly the issue isn&rsquo;t going away. Paradigm&rsquo;s Baltimore-area headquarters is in PJM territory. One of our team members reports seeing a &ldquo;No to Data Centers&rdquo; yard sign in the distant suburbs of Harford County &mdash; even though data centers aren&rsquo;t currently allowed under county code.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Comic Relief
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Before anyone sees this and gets their boxers in a wad&hellip; this is another one of those memes I share both because it&rsquo;s pithy and because it reflects the vibe in at least some conservative pockets of social media&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/6v4DcwS7u6Y6o7z6iW0LM7/9a25489c58e017757246b03c8b9b9ab7/FMF-Issue-051926-2.jpg" alt="Comic Relief" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Generational Warfare
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Meanwhile, I&rsquo;m still getting an earful about the last meme that got people&rsquo;s hackles up &mdash; the one shared in <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/kevin-warshs-no-win-bind">last Thursday&rsquo;s edition</a>.
&ldquo;I get you&rsquo;re trying to show the zeitgeist but at the same time you also show no respect to the massive numbers of readers who pay you who are in fact boomers and Gen-Xers.
&ldquo;Please be more respectful &mdash; and besides that, the millennials and Gen-Zers had it so freaking easy in a world that gave them so much protection and new exciting things, all the new tech, never had to worry about nothing to do, they had it all in the palm of their hands, probably the most spoiled generations IMO&hellip;&rdquo;
You get the idea. I won&rsquo;t share the whole thing. It was very long and it expressed the sort of generational grievances you find everywhere on social media these days. (Although I got a chuckle when he said he was born in 1977; this editor was born, ummm, rather earlier than that.)
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> This generational-resentment thing is getting out of hand.
You see it when Kevin O&rsquo;Leary &mdash; the boomer who wants to build a massive data center in Utah &mdash; hits out at Gen-Zers who he says make $70,000 a year and spend $28 on lunch.
His rant earned an outstanding riposte from Melissa Witte, aka Villgecrazylady, aided by the Grok AI engine&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3tqfxdUtQqv9dH5dzy44Cb/0829a86151522cfd20bbbfa7452a7974/FMF-Issue-051926-3.jpg" alt="Mel Tweet" width="540px" />
But don&rsquo;t take it from someone who I&rsquo;m guessing is an early-wave millennial.
Take it from this early-wave Xer: If you&rsquo;re a boomer, it&rsquo;s not about how hard you worked and what you sacrificed. It&rsquo;s about how you were able to accumulate assets before the power elite hollowed out the middle class in this country and robbed subsequent generations of any hope they could live a better life than you.
(Why do you think they&rsquo;re not interested in having kids?)
Also, do not lose sight of how this year&rsquo;s graduating class got profoundly messed up by COVID lockdowns, restrictions and mandates when they were high school sophomores. (Or juniors or seniors if they ended up on the five- or six-year plan because of how universities deliberately stack prerequisites to extract more money from students.)
I&rsquo;ll leave it there for now. Meanwhile, a boomer reader&rsquo;s comment last week about the FICA taxes he paid over the years prompted the following reaction&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;I read comments about Social Security with a bit of frustration. Yes, I am collecting from Social Security.
&ldquo;Politicians that were elected during my working years are largely responsible for destroying the system by giving out benefits that cannot be paid in the long run.
&ldquo;Those currently paying into the system should also realize that the system was set up assuming people would have children who would contribute in the future. Yes, SS is a Ponzi scheme, but not having children is a bleak future in many ways.
&ldquo;It would hurt me financially, yet it would truly be fair to cut benefits now to recipients because they did not protest 20&ndash;50 years ago.
&ldquo;There is no doubt in my mind that benefits will be compromised in the future. We will see reductions across the board, means testing, full taxation of benefits or destructive inflation so that the full benefit will be of much less value (and cost to the government).
&ldquo;Who will tell the uncomfortable truth to the population? Are there enough mature and thinking people in the country to understand the truth?&rdquo;
Dave responds: Your outlook for Social Security&rsquo;s fate is spot-on.
A pity, because the system wouldn&rsquo;t be that hard to fix. As I&rsquo;ve mentioned now and then since at least 2019, nothing about Social Security is so broken that it can&rsquo;t be fixed with some combination of higher taxes and higher retirement age.
(Yes, it would still be a Ponzi scheme. That&rsquo;s a separate question.)
Maybe in time the partisan divide can be overcome as it was in the early 1980s and the system can be put back on a sounder footing.
Medicare, however, is <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/luigi-mangione-isnt-the-problem">beyond hope</a>.

FMF-Issue-051926-Featured

All the Choices Are Bad

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />A Google-Elon Handshake?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Yes, resistance is real and warranted,&rdquo; a reader writes from Minnesota about the backlash against AI data centers.
We got a lot of responses to <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/backlash-data-centers">Friday&rsquo;s edition</a> exploring that backlash. We&rsquo;ll share several &mdash; including on-the-ground observations near prospective data center sites &mdash; later in Bullet No. 5.
But for the moment, we want to spotlight something we <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/data-centers-in-space">first tackled last fall</a> &mdash; data centers in space.
As a reminder, orbiting data centers solve the problems of Earth-bound data centers &mdash; the power consumption, the noise and so on. They could be powered by 24/7 solar power that doesn&rsquo;t compete with homeowners and businesses for scarce electricity on our pale blue dot.
Pie in the sky, you say? There are engineering challenges for sure. But Elon Musk thinks they can be overcome.
In fact, he thinks the next generation of SpaceX&rsquo;s Starlink satellites will be ideally suited for the task.
Orbiting data centers are central to SpaceX&rsquo;s investor pitch ahead of what&rsquo;s likely to be the biggest IPO in history. (And by the way, according to several media outlets the IPO date is now set &mdash; Friday June 12. That&rsquo;s 25 days from now. The ticker will be SPCX.)
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Google doesn&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s pie in the sky either.
Last week The Wall Street Journal reported that Google and SpaceX are in talks: SpaceX would launch the rockets taking Google data center satellites into orbit.
What makes that interesting is that last fall, Google announced its own launch initiative called Project Suncatcher &mdash; working with the firm Planet Labs (PL) to build prototype satellites for data centers.
Clearly, Google is covering its bases. Also, the new arrangement is to Google&rsquo;s advantage given its 6.1% ownership of SpaceX.
The news comes on the heels of Anthropic&rsquo;s own partnership with SpaceX &mdash; in which Anthropic gets access to all the &ldquo;compute&rdquo; within SpaceX&rsquo;s giant data center complex in Memphis. As part of that announcement, Anthropic expressed interest in having SpaceX launch its own orbiting data centers.
Now&hellip; step back for a moment to think about what this Google-SpaceX tie-up means&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;The largest information infrastructure company in the world is negotiating with the largest space company in the world to deploy AI compute in space,&rdquo; says Paradigm tech investing pro Ray Blanco.
&ldquo;That single piece of news is the loudest validation yet of what&rsquo;s to come. Power-hungry, polluting industries &mdash; starting with AI data centers &mdash; are moving off Earth and into orbit.
&ldquo;This isn't a future event, although its full expression will be. It&rsquo;s starting to happen right now, in contracts and capital expenditure decisions being made.&rdquo;
The announcement lit a fire last week under several of the space-oriented names in Ray&rsquo;s Catalyst Trader portfolio.
&ldquo;This isn't a momentum trade riding the SpaceX IPO,&rdquo; says Ray. &ldquo;This is the market repricing space as a real industrial sector &mdash; defense, commercial and infrastructure.&rdquo;
Stay tuned in the days ahead. Now that the date for the IPO has been set, we&rsquo;re on the lookout for ways to piggyback the event for profits between now and June 12.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />Data Center Energy Merger
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Back on Earth, the data center phenomenon is one of the big market stories today.
NextEra Energy (NEE) is merging with Dominion Energy (D) in a $67 billion deal.
It&rsquo;s interesting in that NextEra is one of those &ldquo;independent power producers&rdquo; that aren&rsquo;t regulated utilities. They&rsquo;ve been on our radar at Paradigm since early 2025. (A year ago at this time we did a rare free pick in 5 Bullets of Constellation Energy &mdash; which rose 34% by year-end.)
Dominion, on the other hand, owns regulated utilities in North Carolina and Virginia &mdash; the latter state being home to &ldquo;Data Center Alley.&rdquo;
For the moment, the Street is down big-time on NEE&rsquo;s effort to diversify, sending shares down 5.2% at last check. Dominion, on the other hand, has rallied 10%.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Elsewhere, the Iran war looms over markets now that the ceasefire has lasted nearly as long as the hot phase of the war.
Early this morning, Donald Trump said the &ldquo;clock is ticking&rdquo; for Tehran &mdash; and with that, U.S. oil futures have leapt over 1.3%. They&rsquo;re approaching $107 for the first time since April 30.
As was the case Friday, rising oil prices are translating to rising inflation fears and thus rising bond yields: The 10-year Treasury note is over 4.6% for the first time in a year. (That won&rsquo;t do any favors for mortgage rates.) The 30-year T-bond is up to 5.13%, another high last seen in 2007.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> But unlike Friday, the fear isn&rsquo;t being transmitted through the stock market &mdash; not too much anyway. 
The Nasdaq is down about three-quarters of a percent, sinking back toward 26,000 &mdash; dragged down largely by another 2.6% drop in the Philadelphia Semiconductor index.
The S&amp;P 500 is down a little over a third of a percent at 7,381. The Dow is flat at 49,511.
Pullbacks are healthy, and that&rsquo;s how Zach Scheidt &mdash; strategist for both Altucher&rsquo;s True Alpha and Rickards&rsquo; Insider Intel &mdash; sees it right now.
&ldquo;A short-term reset in semis paired with a broadening into the less-loved parts of the tape would be the best possible setup for this market.
&ldquo;It calms the nerves around the chip mania. It gives the equal-weight S&amp;P 500 a chance to start participating. It pulls in money that's been sitting on the sidelines because everything looked too extended.
&ldquo;We've been calling for this kind of broadening for a couple weeks now. If we get it, the rally has a lot more room to run. If we don't &mdash; if money pulls out of semis and just sits in cash &mdash; that&rsquo;s a different conversation.
&ldquo;But the fact that many of the daily lows are getting bought tells me that the market bulls aren&rsquo;t out of gas just yet.&rdquo;
Meanwhile, precious metals are relatively quiet too &mdash; gold flat after Friday&rsquo;s beatdown at $4,541 and silver up less than a buck to $76.55.
No joy in crypto &mdash; Bitcoin sinking toward $76,000 and Ethereum very close to breaking below $2,100.
Oh, and in case you need a reminder&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/68Wp5XieLS3WRYEzu9bGmT/95af31974c0f7e9b5e00b4a937188ecc/FMF-issue-051826-1.jpg" alt="Don Johnson Tweet" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Was There a Deal?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> It appears the feds are about to drop their very strange &ldquo;fraud&rdquo; case against India&rsquo;s second-richest man.
During the final weeks of the Biden administration, the Justice Department charged the billionaire Gautam Adani with bribing Indian government officials to snag juicy solar-energy contracts.
Yes, Washington prosecuted someone overseas for bribing his own government officials &mdash; on the theory that it somehow amounted to &ldquo;misrepresenting&rdquo; his firm&rsquo;s anti-bribery and anti-corruption practices to its American investors and lenders.
(Did any of Adani&rsquo;s American investors complain? No, they did not.)
None of it made any sense. As I wrote at the time of the indictment, if you&rsquo;re in Washington, D.C.... and if your status as &ldquo;the world&rsquo;s sole superpower&rdquo; is hanging by a thread&hellip; and if the nation-state that&rsquo;s home to one out of six humans on Earth is deftly playing off Washington against Beijing and Moscow&hellip;
&hellip; then it&rsquo;s probably a dumb idea to prosecute the second-richest guy in that country on a flimsy pretext, especially when he&rsquo;s besties with the guy who&rsquo;s been prime minister for over a decade now.
Shortly after taking office last year, Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Justice Department to revise the guidelines for how it enforces the 1977 law under which Adani was prosecuted. India&rsquo;s business media speculated about what it might mean for the Adani case.
Well, we&rsquo;re starting to learn.
Last week, The Washington Post reported the Justice Department is on the verge of dropping the case. Also last week the SEC settled a related civil complaint with Adani and his nephew for $18 million.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> The timing of these developments is&hellip; interesting.
Lost in the pomp and circumstance of Trump&rsquo;s visit to China last week was a meeting of the BRICS foreign ministers in India.
As you&rsquo;ll recall, BRICS is a grouping of the world&rsquo;s biggest developing economies &mdash; Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Since 2023, those five countries have been joined by Ethiopia, Egypt, Iran, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates.
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi urged his counterparts to condemn what he called &ldquo;violations of international law by the United States and Israel.&rdquo;
No condemnation was forthcoming.
In fact, there was no joint statement at the conclusion of the conference &mdash; not even something vague and vanilla about safe passage through international waters.
As host of the summit, India was on the hook to find consensus. Maybe that wasn&rsquo;t possible; depending on what media outlet you want to believe, the United Arab Emirates nixed any joint statement. And that makes sense given that among the Arab sheikdoms, the UAE is the most hostile to Tehran.
But on the other hand, maybe New Delhi found it advantageous to avoid consensus. As noted above, Indian leaders have spent years skillfully playing off Washington against Beijing and Moscow &mdash; their charter membership in BRICS notwithstanding.
(Also, don&rsquo;t forget India and China have an intractable border dispute.)
We&rsquo;ll never know if there was a quid pro quo here: India deep-sixes a BRICS condemnation of the United States, while Washington drops the case against Adani.
But stranger things have happened&hellip;
[Just in: As we&rsquo;re about to hit &ldquo;send,&rdquo; Reuters reports the Trump administration is dropping the criminal case.
&ldquo;The resolution of outstanding cases against one of the world's richest people came after Adani's attorney, who is also a personal attorney of U.S. President Donald Trump, said last month his client wanted to invest $10 billion in the United States ⁠but could not do so while the cases proceeded, according to a source familiar with the matter.&rdquo;]
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Comic Relief
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Here&rsquo;s a meme we just ran across that kinda tees up today&rsquo;s mailbag&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4ThRZWJFvfgTLlxAxG4aeC/a7804ec3b34f64a76d2fed74434b4dda/FMF-issue-051826-2.jpg" alt="Comedic Relief" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Data Center Backlash
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;The average American does not want a data center installed anywhere near where they live,&rdquo; a reader writes as we resume the responses to Friday&rsquo;s edition.
&ldquo;There is no &lsquo;plus&rsquo; for them to risk it. Declining property values, risks to their water, noise pollution, risks to the air they breathe, increased utility costs, potential blackouts and traffic.
&ldquo;And for what? So Zuck and Gates and Bezos and O'Leary and the rest of the Killbillies can get even richer. Perhaps they will be willing to tempt communities into supporting them with a bit of a sweetener &mdash; a tax-free payoff to each property owner within a certain distance of the data center. Let's start the bidding at $1 million each. That's only $10 billion for 10,000 residents.
&ldquo;Chicken feed next to the data center capital expenditures. And tax deductible for them.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Indiana residents are resisting,&rdquo; says our next entry. &ldquo;Who would agree to rolling blackouts? It&rsquo;s insane.
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m not a tech person, but it is my understanding a large number of data centers are needed to create a network of autonomous vehicles, drones, robots and other &lsquo;intelligent machines&rsquo; operating over large geographical areas that run on cloud computing infrastructure. But why?
&ldquo;Can these machines not operate independently within specific use cases? Drones for farming. Robots for resource extraction. Can factories not run on in-house programming to make a toaster? Can a supercomputer not scrape data and find a cure for cancer with one small local server farm?&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;I live in Cathedral City, California &mdash; next door to Palm Springs. Down valley is the town of Coachella&hellip; primarily on agriculture economy in a desert locale.
&ldquo;Residents of Coachella are currently opposing the approval of the construction of a Data Center Complex, based on concerns of air pollution, electric supply consumption and consumption of an already depleting supply of water in a desert environment.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;I think the backlash is warranted! It's going to get worse.
&ldquo;AI centers will have complete control over your privacy. As soon as they get hacked into, the whole economy will be turned upside down.
&ldquo;Even now you can't trust Big Tech. It's all about control and taking your money in the name of progress. China and Russia are going to experience the same thing. The biggest difference is they will kill their own people to get their way.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> We also heard from a longtime reader with very specific subject-area knowledge.
&ldquo;I have read &lsquo;the 5&rsquo; since its inception, but can count on one finger the times I have provided feedback. I have a MS (with Distinction) in Computer Science specializing in artificial intelligence.
&ldquo;Unlike all the &lsquo;experts&rsquo; that come out of the woodwork, I actually have some first-hand
knowledge of AI. I always hesitate to say &lsquo;it's different this time&hellip;&rsquo; but this time it actually may be different.
&ldquo;The potential for AI to be used for &lsquo;bad&rsquo; things is &lsquo;off the charts.&rsquo; If the potential is there,
then someone, somewhere, at some time will use it for nefarious purposes.
&ldquo;Personally, I agree with Anonymous Conservative, but I refer to &lsquo;data centers&rsquo; as &lsquo;human control centers.&rsquo; I pray I am wrong, but believe I will still be among the living when the SHTAIF (my own acronym &mdash; sh** hits the AI fan!).
&ldquo;Dave, I always enjoy reading your thoughts&hellip; and there will be no &lsquo;buts&rsquo; here.&rdquo;
Dave responds: Thanks to all who wrote in.
Tellingly, no one wrote in to say the issue is overblown or that the opposition is stirred up by activists with a hidden agenda.
And there&rsquo;s a significant slice of the Paradigm readership &mdash; mostly James Altucher subscribers &mdash; who presumably have high awareness about and enthusiasm for AI. Make of that what you will.
In any event, the issue isn&rsquo;t going away. It is not yet a risk factor in AI-related investments&hellip; but we&rsquo;d be remiss not to keep the issue on our radar as the year goes on&hellip;

FMF-issue-051826-Featured

A Google-Elon Handshake?

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />Backlash! (Data Centers)
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />Lake Tahoe &mdash; home to gorgeous skies, clear waters, year-round recreation. And soon, no electricity.
OK, that&rsquo;s an overstatement. But the fact remains that &ldquo;Lake Tahoe doesn&rsquo;t know where its power will come from after next ski season,&rdquo; says a report at Fortune &mdash; &ldquo;and it&rsquo;s a major problem for the 49,000 residents who call the region home.&rdquo;
The Tahoe area is served by a small power company called Liberty Utilities. Liberty gets its power from NV Energy, a Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary serving most of Nevada. NV Energy just gave notice that it will cease furnishing power to Liberty Utilities after May 2027.
The power currently going to Tahoe will be redirected to&hellip; data centers.
As it happens, northern Nevada is one of the fastest-growing data center corridors in the country.
The situation in Tahoe hasn&rsquo;t turned into protests. Not yet, not there.
But elsewhere&hellip;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;I&rsquo;ve never seen anything like this backlash against AI and data centers,&rdquo; says the veteran energy journalist Robert Bryce.
&ldquo;Just to put it in context,&rdquo; he said last weekend on the Financial Sense podcast, &ldquo;in all of 2025, there were 49 rejections or restrictions of data centers in the U.S. &mdash; 49 for all 12 months. There have already been 79 in the first four months and one week of 2026.&rdquo;
Polling by Quinnipiac University shows that among Americans who oppose data centers in their communities, 72% are concerned about rising electricity costs&hellip; 64% are concerned about the water that data centers suck up for cooling&hellip; and 41% are concerned about noise.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />Ground Zero for the data center backlash this month is Box Elder County, Utah.
On May 4, an overflow crowd showed up for a county board meeting &mdash; 600 people packing an exhibition hall at the county fairgrounds, another 300 outside.
On the agenda &mdash; an enormous 40,000-acre data center project called Stratos, requiring 9 gigawatts of electricity, about twice the electricity currently used in the entire state of Utah.
The atmosphere got so heated the board retreated to an inner room and streamed the proceedings to the crowd on Zoom.
Commissioners voted to green-light the data center. They said their hands are tied because the land in question isn&rsquo;t zoned &mdash; and that by giving their approval, they&rsquo;ll have more of a say in the process going forward.
Opponents still hope the process won&rsquo;t go forward at all. Yesterday, they took their case to the steps of Utah&rsquo;s capitol building in Salt Lake City.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/2TW7rEF96KBVey7H1aVKKT/b31adb67916b826128c2ffc2ddbe5ae8/FMF-Issue-051526-1.jpg.png" alt="No Data Center Protest" width="540px" />
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />One of the major investors in Stratos has become a lightning rod because of his celebrity status &mdash; Kevin O&rsquo;Leary of Shark Tank fame.
This week he tried to make his case during an interview with Tucker Carlson. It didn&rsquo;t go well.
At one point, O&rsquo;Leary tried to invoke &ldquo;capitalism&rdquo; and Carlson shot back, &ldquo;How is this capitalism? If taxpayers are paying for some of it, how is that capitalism?&rdquo; O&rsquo;Leary dodged the question and went off on a tangent about how red states like Florida are attracting people and business from blue states like New York.
<a href="https://x.com/FurkanGozukara/status/2054745428927635471" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3YTxhdT9mac1hp4A4ODOOW/7e55dbd10738edd79ee9be11b282904f/FMF-Issue-051526-2.jpg" alt="Furkan Tweet" width="540px" /></a>
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />But it&rsquo;s not just about the NIMBY (&ldquo;not in my backyard&rdquo;) effect. Something bigger is at work. The backlash is &ldquo;cultural,&rdquo; according to Bryce.
&ldquo;Ordinary people are looking at Big Tech &mdash; Amazon, Google, Oracle, Microsoft, Meta/Facebook, the rest&mdash;and they don&rsquo;t trust Big Tech. Our privacy is being taken, and I think people are looking at all this and saying, &lsquo;I can&rsquo;t fight these monster, multitrillion-dollar companies in the virtual world. But I can fight them, or even stop them, in my neighborhood.&rsquo; I think that&rsquo;s key.&rdquo;
Carlson tapped into that sentiment elsewhere in his episode this week &mdash; apprehensions about AI and what the power elite plans to do with it.
&ldquo;If you&rsquo;re rolling out what they&rsquo;re telling you, and clearly they believe, is the single greatest technological change in the history of human life on this planet&hellip; you&rsquo;d think one of your main concerns is does this change the relationship of the powerless to the powerful, the relationship of the citizen to the state for example?
&ldquo;But that doesn&rsquo;t seem to be Larry Fink&rsquo;s main concern. His main concern is how do we protect our investment?&rdquo;
Let&rsquo;s delve into this cultural backlash for Bullet No. 2&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />&ldquo;Rewiring the World&rdquo;... for an AI Dystopia?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />AI was a major topic earlier this month at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills.
Among the speakers was Larry Fink &mdash; CEO of BlackRock, the world&rsquo;s biggest asset manager.
After discussing Iranian drone attacks on data centers in the United Arab Emirates during the early days of the Iran war, Fink said, &ldquo;How do we make sure we&rsquo;re protecting those $50 billion, $75 billion investments? We have to relook at everything because of the role of drone warfare.
&ldquo;Right now we&rsquo;re looking at it internationally but one of my concerns is could it be a domestic terrorism, using a $3,000 drone?&rdquo;
You didn&rsquo;t have to look far to find online commenters who took those remarks to mean that Fink believes anyone who opposes data center construction might be a budding domestic terrorist&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4knJESwgMslb225Yx6Tz4f/f3905a802c4f73fade68c0c4004a70d4/FMF-Issue-051526-3.jpg" alt="No Data Shadow of Ezra tweet" width="540px" />
Also speaking on the panel with Fink was the legendary investor Bruce Flatt, sometimes called the Warren Buffett of Canada. He waxed enthusiastic about &ldquo;rewiring&rdquo; the world economy.
&ldquo;For the next 10 years,&rdquo; he said, &ldquo;we will be rewiring the global economy to lay the networks [of] cloud, artificial intelligence factories and data centers&hellip;
&ldquo;There will be $10 trillion from power, AI factories, data centers and fiber buildout laid to basically rewire the world for the new economy that&rsquo;s coming.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />&ldquo;That new economy is probably going to be our total enslavement, owning nothing and pretending to be happy so we don&rsquo;t get beamed every night,&rdquo; says the individual behind the Anonymous Conservative website.
&ldquo;Increasingly when I hear &lsquo;AI data centers&rsquo; now, I really hear &lsquo;Our mechanism of total surveillance and complete control which will never allow our power to be challenged in any way.&rsquo; 
&ldquo;Unfortunately, as the Covid episode and the migrant replacement show, they appear to have a strong desire to kill us, and presently are only restrained somewhat by a small fear of triggering resistance. It looks like AI data centers may remove that small fear.&rdquo;
OK&hellip; I&rsquo;m not saying I agree with that assessment. I&rsquo;m just saying that&rsquo;s the sentiment out there. Anonymous Conservative is an extreme manifestation of a vibe that resonates with a sizable swath of the population at large.
These issues &mdash; both the localized backlash against data center construction and the wider backlash against AI on privacy/surveillance grounds &mdash; aren&rsquo;t going away.
It&rsquo;s at this point I turn it over to you, dear reader. Is there a backlash where you live? Do you think it&rsquo;s warranted? Do you think it&rsquo;s overblown? Write and we&rsquo;ll share your responses next week: <a href="mailto:feedback@paradigmpressroom.com">feedback@paradigmpressroom.com</a>
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />The Disappointment Trade
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />It&rsquo;s one of those risk-off days in the market, across nearly every asset class. And for once, corporate media aren&rsquo;t falling all over themselves to find &ldquo;reasons.&rdquo;
&ldquo;S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq fall, strained by tech pullback and yields spike,&rdquo; is the most that CNBC will venture.
Oftentimes there&rsquo;s no &ldquo;reason&rdquo; at all for a single day&rsquo;s trading action. But if there&rsquo;s one today, it might be this: Mr. Market was expecting some sort of grand bargain coming out of the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing &mdash; after which Chinese leaders would lean on their friends in Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
But Trump is flying home with no such outcome.
Thus, the disappointment trade: U.S. oil futures are up nearly $3.50 to $104.59 &mdash; the highest all month. (Also, with the summit now over, Trump could conceivably resume the war later today after the markets close for the weekend. No one wants to be short crude under those circumstances.)
Rising oil prices translate to rising inflation expectations &mdash; which then translate to rising Treasury yields.
The yield on a 10-year note has sailed up to 4.58%, the highest in nearly a year. The 30-year bond is up to 5.12%, the highest since &mdash; yikes!
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3TMjoFem0j1V77QLSaJr8C/64b785cda7e952660b9560c023c9832b/FMF-Issue-051526-4.jpg" alt="Jim Bianco Tweet" width="540px" />
That&rsquo;s bond investors saying they want to be compensated for the risk of taking on Uncle Sam&rsquo;s debt at a fixed rate over a long stretch of time.
Jitters in the bond market of this magnitude almost always drag down the stock market. After closing yesterday over 7,500 for the first time, the S&amp;P 500 is down nearly 1%. Ditto for the Dow. And the Nasdaq is down nearly 1.25%.
The highflying chip stocks are dipping a little closer to earth, the Philadelphia Semiconductor index down 3.2%.
Precious metals? Getting crushed. Gold is down over $100 to $4,542. Silver is down over $7 to $76.26.
Crypto is faring reasonably well under the circumstances. Still Bitcoin is sinking toward $79,000 and Ethereum near $2,200.
One economic number of note: The Federal Reserve says industrial production jumped 0.7% in April &mdash; way more than expected. It remains to be seen whether that&rsquo;s the start of an uptrend, or just a surge of incoming orders from buyers hoping to beat looming price increases.
No major economic numbers next week &mdash; instead all eyes will be on Nvidia&rsquo;s earnings, due after the closing bell on Wednesday.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Fort Knox Redux
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />Aw c&rsquo;mon, not this again.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/6DhCdDBpsECScuKFfElBl5/025b42f6620d4f6fdfd7860115a3dad9/FMF-Issue-051526-5.jpg" alt="Watcher guru tweet" width="540px" />
&ldquo;We wanted to go and knock on the door of Fort Knox &mdash; a very thick door &mdash; and to see whether or not we have any gold in there,&rdquo; said Donald Trump a few days ago on Sharyl Attkisson&rsquo;s syndicated news show.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a very interesting question. We played with that. I wonder if they left the gold in Fort Knox, because they steal a lot,&rdquo; he rambled. &ldquo;I do want to go to Fort Knox sometime.
&ldquo;I want to see if the gold is there, which I&rsquo;m sure it will be.&rdquo;
Whatever.
We remember the buzz early in Trump&rsquo;s second term. Our Jim Rickards <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/golds-hype-cycle-you-are-here">poured cold water</a> on the notion even then. By summertime, when it was obvious the audit was never gonna happen, <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/fort-knox-fake-out">Jim explained </a><a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/fort-knox-fake-out">why</a> it was never gonna happen.
For anyone taking Trump at his word about Fort Knox now &mdash; well, it&rsquo;s time to trot out the meme.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/14SU2KQfOPh0bNNiPWwEtY/ea2ea66f6f85084f85ad791d88a1e0f5/FMF-Issue-051526-6.jpg" alt="Comedic Relief" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Generational Resentment
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" />The meme shared <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/kevin-warshs-no-win-bind">in yesterday&rsquo;s edition</a> brought forth the following objection&hellip;
&ldquo;Dave &mdash; saw your &lsquo;cartoon&rsquo; with retiring boomers laying in wait to attack hardworking millennials &mdash; interesting take on working-class boomers who busted their asses for years and get their basic SS bene and Medicare.
&ldquo;Some like this old guy remember all the years paying self-employed FICA as well as FICA for two&ndash;three employees for years. Dude, I coulda done better avoiding SS and paying into my own acct. in lieu of that. Anyway, I am now looking for the nearest high cliff so that I can just keep on walking.
&ldquo;Short memories are the part of the devil's brew to create hate and discord. Maybe you thought it was just humor, but you missed the mark, and you dropped a notch or two in my personal respect ledger.&nbsp;
&ldquo;You still get a bunch of things right, so I'll keep reading. Hang in there (not literally!)&rdquo;
Dave responds: Sometimes I share a meme not because I necessarily agree with it, but as a reflection of the zeitgeist. And that&rsquo;s the case here.
No doubt you worked hard to attain your present circumstances. Point is, there are legions of millennials and Gen-Zers who feel that no matter how hard they work, they&rsquo;ll never be able to live as well as the boomers of their personal acquaintance.
This might be especially so for the oldest millennials, now turning 45 (!) and approaching the midpoint of their working years.
Today&rsquo;s not the time to get into the whys and wherefores of the younger generations&rsquo; resentments. Suffice to say they exist &mdash; and they&rsquo;re going to come more and more to the surface in the years ahead.
No judgment attached here &mdash; just an early-wave Xer calling balls and strikes&hellip;

FMF-Issue-051526-Featured

Backlash! (Data Centers)

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />Kevin Warsh&rsquo;s No-Win Bind
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Kevin Warsh might rue the day he put himself in contention for the job of Federal Reserve chair.
He won Senate confirmation yesterday, 54-45. The only Democrat to vote yea was Pennsylvania&rsquo;s John Fetterman.
Mainstream media coverage focused on the narrow vote, in contrast to years gone by when Jerome Powell and Janet Yellen commanded more bipartisan support. Yesterday&rsquo;s vote &ldquo;reflected how tensions with the White House have dragged the Fed deeper into the political fray,&rdquo; as The Wall Street Journal sees it.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> That&rsquo;s not even half the story: &ldquo;Warsh is stepping directly into one of the most dangerous policy environments in decades,&rdquo; says Paradigm macro maven Jim Rickards.
As you know, Donald Trump wants the Fed to lower short-term interest rates. Presumably Warsh wants to accommodate the president&rsquo;s wishes &mdash; in contrast with Fed hawks who want to leave rates alone or even raise them.
Unfortunately for Warsh, the most recent inflation and job numbers &ldquo;give the Fed&rsquo;s hawkish wing exactly what it wants,&rdquo; Jim tells us.
As mentioned here on Tuesday, the official inflation rate has sailed up to a three-year high of 3.8%. And the headline number for new jobs during April was a healthy 115,000.
From the standpoint of conventional monetary policy there&rsquo;s no reason to cut rates at the next Fed meeting a month from now.
And even if Warsh wants to cut, he&rsquo;s one of only 12 members of the Fed&rsquo;s Open Market Committee; he has to persuade at least six other members to see things his way.
&ldquo;The hawks will argue the labor market remains resilient,&rdquo; Jim says. &ldquo;They&rsquo;ll say inflation risks tied to war-driven energy prices are still elevated. They&rsquo;ll warn that cutting rates prematurely could ignite another inflation wave.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;That leaves Warsh trapped between economics and politics before he even settles into the chairman&rsquo;s office,&rdquo; Jim goes on.
&ldquo;If he pushes aggressively for cuts, critics will immediately accuse him of doing the White House&rsquo;s bidding. Every move will be scrutinized through the lens of political influence. Once markets believe monetary policy is being dictated politically rather than economically, trust erodes quickly.
&ldquo;But Warsh faces the opposite danger as well,&rdquo; Jim goes on.
&ldquo;If he moves too cautiously&hellip; if he delays cuts and sounds overly concerned about inflation&hellip; he risks disappointing the very political coalition that helped elevate him to the position in the first place.
&ldquo;That creates a no-win scenario.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Especially in light of the fact that &ldquo;Warsh isn&rsquo;t inheriting a normal inflation cycle. He&rsquo;s inheriting stagflation risk,&rdquo; says Jim.
It&rsquo;s that awful 1970s combination of economic stagnation and inflation at the same time. Inflation is roaring again this year &mdash; and the job market isn&rsquo;t nearly as healthy as the headline numbers suggest. For instance, temporary employment is weakening; when businesses need to cut payroll, temps are usually the first to go.
Warsh now owns &ldquo;a policy trap unlike anything we&rsquo;ve seen in decades,&rdquo; Jim concludes.
&ldquo;Markets initially may celebrate his arrival. Wall Street generally likes the idea of lower rates. Risk assets tend to rally whenever investors believe monetary easing is coming.
&ldquo;But markets may be underestimating how difficult it will be for Warsh to actually deliver those cuts.&rdquo;
Bottom line: &ldquo;This isn&rsquo;t simply a personnel change at the central bank. It&rsquo;s the beginning of a political, economic and monetary collision that could shape markets for years to come.&rdquo;
And we&rsquo;ll aim to keep you ahead of the curve.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />Markets Today: Bad Signs, Good Signs
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> While the U.S. stock market is at all-time highs, something disturbing is happening beneath the surface.
One day recently, the S&amp;P 500 set a record close. But at the same time, less than 60% of the index&rsquo;s 500 component stocks exceeded their 50-day and 200-day moving averages.
&ldquo;It has happened only a handful times in the past,&rdquo; says Paradigm trading pro Enrique Abeyta &mdash; &ldquo;all of them between Dec. 21, 1998, and March 22, 2000, the end of the internet bubble.&rdquo;
No, that&rsquo;s not a sell-everything signal. Because on the other hand, last week the S&amp;P notched a weekly close above its upper Bollinger Band for the first time in over a year.
&ldquo;The Bollinger Band,&rdquo; Enrique tells us, &ldquo;is a technical signal measuring distance from moving averages.&rdquo;
What just happened has happened only a few times before &mdash; and 100% of the time the S&amp;P was higher both nine months later and one year later.
Put it all together and Enrique says we have a valuable signal for market timing &mdash; &ldquo;good/great for the next year but then watch out below!&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Speaking of good/great, the S&amp;P just surpassed the 7,500 mark for the first time &mdash; up over three-quarters of a percent on the day.
The Nasdaq&rsquo;s gain is even stronger, now just 25 points away from 26,700. And for once, the Dow is more or less keeping pace &mdash; back over 50,000 for the first time since February.
Paradigm readers have racked up a slew of winners over the last 24 hours&hellip;
<ul>
<li>Enrique&rsquo;s Breaking Profits readers have collected 300% on Credo Technology &mdash; one of his first recommendations when this entry-level newsletter was launched last year</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>PRO-level readers of Rickards&rsquo; Strategic Intelligence bagged 63% gains on a long-term holding in Seabridge Gold</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Chris Cimorelli&rsquo;s 10X Trade Club readers bagged a fast 291% playing Apple call options and another 284% with calls on a Chinese internet ETF</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>On the bearish side, Rickards&rsquo; Crisis Trader readers collected 336% in less than a month playing put options on Tractor Supply.</li>
</ul>
The big economic number today is retail sales &mdash; up 0.5% from March to April, on par with Wall Street&rsquo;s expectations. Of course, that&rsquo;s skewed by rising gasoline prices; back those out and the jump is a more modest 0.3%. Which is even more disappointing when you realize these numbers are not adjusted for inflation.
Meanwhile, not much news we can see yet from the Trump-Xi meeting in Beijing &mdash; other than Xi making clear that the issue of Taiwan could bring the two superpowers into conflict. (Three years ago your editor <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/no-blood-for-chips">made the case</a> that there&rsquo;s nothing about Taiwan worth risking American blood and treasure over.)
Treasury yields are backing down but the 10-year note is still over 4.45% and the 30-year bond remains above 5%.
In the commodity complex, U.S. oil futures are down slightly but still over $100. Gold is back below $4,700 and silver is off over two bucks to $85.14.
Bitcoin is rallying, just shy of $81,000 again while Ethereum sits at $2,284.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />FDA Follies
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> In Washington, FDA commissioner Marty Makary just got the heave-ho &mdash; for the wrong reasons, in the eyes of our biotech expert Ray Blanco.
Makary resigned under pressure yesterday &mdash; &ldquo;pushed out over his decisions regarding vapes and abortion pills,&rdquo; says Ray.
And not for rejecting a string of promising drugs that would have helped desperate and dying patients.
&ldquo;That tells you what the political priority structure is,&rdquo; Ray tells us. &ldquo;But the FDA has always been a mess.
&ldquo;In 1992, FDA Commissioner David Kessler said the quiet part out loud: &lsquo;If members of our society were empowered to make their own decisions&hellip; then the whole rationale for the FDA would cease to exist.&rsquo;
&ldquo;We had the man running the agency, on the record, stating that the entire institution depends on patients not being allowed to choose.
&ldquo;That principle is why a dying cancer patient can't access a therapy that might save them. It's also why a healthy adult couldn't decline a vaccine they had questions about during COVID. It&rsquo;s the same architecture.
&ldquo;A 2018 analysis in Cancer Medicine, authored by oncologists at the University of Ottawa, MD Anderson, and UCSD, calculated what FDA delays actually cost. The finding: One life-year is lost in North America for every 2.2 minutes of approval delay. Worldwide, one life-year every 12 seconds.
&ldquo;Makary made things worse because he doubled down on denying lifesaving therapies.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Alas, Makary&rsquo;s departure doesn&rsquo;t change what Ray calls &ldquo;the fundamental anti-freedom-to-choose architecture that is the FDA&rsquo;s reason to exist.
&ldquo;Moreover the denial machine he created remains in place&rdquo; &mdash; led, Ray says, by Katherine Szarama, a Makary pick still serving as acting director of the FDA&rsquo;s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
&ldquo;She wrote the policy that produced the recent gene and cancer therapy rejections before she joined the agency.
&ldquo;I predict biotech will rally when she&rsquo;s replaced.&rdquo;
Stay tuned&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Comic Relief, Pulse of the Nation Edition
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> We present the following both for its entertainment value &mdash; and as a revealing window into attitudes and resentments here in these United States&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/2mbU6mhXA0pp6JpNkIORDo/824399954276b0c784afd04bebdb7448/FMF-Issue-051426-1.jpg" alt="Comedic Relief" width="540px" />
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: AI Regulation (and More)
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;The idea of the Federal Death Authority (FDA) being in charge of AI is a joke. Right?&rdquo; a reader writes after <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/ai-speeding-toward-a-brick-wall">Tuesday&rsquo;s edition</a>.
[To be clear, the Trump administration is talking about FDA regulation as a model for AI regulation. Which is just as concerning. But go on&hellip;]
&ldquo;I remember the story published after the death of FDA regulator <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Nestor">John Nestor</a>, and his habit of getting on the Washington beltway and immediately moving to the left-most lane while slowing his car down to 55 because &lsquo;that's the speed limit.&rsquo; Also the fact that his reign of uselessness was marked by not approving any new drugs.
&ldquo;That's exactly what's needed for great innovations!&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Regarding AI, believing restraint in a capitalist model is a part of the equation is laughable to me,&rdquo; counters another reader &mdash; &ldquo;not to mention (fill in your favorite foreign adversary) will stop at nothing to shove their AI advances up America&rsquo;s ass. Our adversaries&rsquo; advances in AI scare me more than the monsters shepherding AI in the U.S.
&ldquo;Each day I look forward to The 5. I don&rsquo;t necessarily agree with all you share, but it always gives me a lot to think about and I always believe you try to deliver objective perspective. Thank you.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> The discussion of AI regulation Tuesday prompted our final correspondent to say that &ldquo;Dave, your skepticism about Trump has been validated.
&ldquo;His idiotic Iran war seems to have completely changed his America First trajectory. It has also started making him afraid of the bogeyman. He &lsquo;lost&rsquo; the 2020 election in large part because he did not follow his instinct relative to COVID and shutdowns. He got fooled into getting into this war by those that were good at playing on his hubris. Now we are stuck, and our kids will be in the crosshairs if Trump can't get comfortable taking an L here.
&ldquo;But he's now second-guessing himself on other things, like AI, and stopped thinking in terms of USA first. He's now in this &lsquo;make the world a better&rsquo; place, which is where every stupid president has been politically, except maybe Reagan. And look how America has suffered.
&ldquo;Trump is turning out to be a RINO, as they all end up being, save for a few, e.g., Massie. So discouraging.
&ldquo;If even our greatest hopes turn out to be like Trump is turning out to be, there is no hope. I believe we will be a full communist state within 10 years. Between the libertarians that do nothing except root for the unobtainable, the RINOs that all perform the role of fisherman, i.e., giving a little line here and there to reel in the conservative fish, and fascist leftists, we are doomed.&rdquo;
Dave responds: And people call me cynical!
As long as you brought it up&hellip; the special interests&rsquo; long knives are out for Thomas Massie, with his primary election in Kentucky&rsquo;s Fourth Congressional district next Tuesday.
&ldquo;Don&rsquo;t believe the BS last-minute accusations and betting market shifts,&rdquo; says the comedian and podcaster Dave Smith. &ldquo;These are obvious signs of a concerted effort.&rdquo;
&ldquo;Our country hangs in the balance,&rdquo; adds Clint Russell of the Liberty Lockdown podcast. &ldquo;Thomas Massie may be our last line of peaceful defense.&rdquo;
I&rsquo;d like to think Russell is engaged in hyperbole here &mdash; but I fear he might be on to something.

FMF-Issue-051426-Featured

Kevin Warsh’s No-Win Bind

<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-1_2x-new.png 2x" alt="1" width="37" />AI Speeding Toward a Brick Wall
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> If you care about American competitiveness in the AI space, today&rsquo;s Bullet No. 1 won&rsquo;t be easy reading.
Twice last week, we took note of a major change of heart on the part of the Trump administration. The power of Anthropic&rsquo;s new Mythos model &mdash; supposedly unearthing major vulnerabilities in nearly every operating system and web browser &mdash; sparked fears within the West Wing of a major AI-enabled cyberattack.
Thus an executive order of some sort is in the works that will result in much more government oversight of the sector.
In addition, Team Trump is doubling down on a Biden-administration scheme in which major AI firms share their models with the feds before they&rsquo;re released to the public.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Gone are the freewheeling days of 2025 in which Silicon Valley expected Trump and crew to keep their hands off AI.
&ldquo;We&rsquo;re going to make this industry absolutely the top,&rdquo; said the president last summer. &ldquo;We can&rsquo;t stop it with politics. We can&rsquo;t stop it with foolish rules and even stupid rules.&rdquo;
That was then, this is now: During a recent interview on Fox Business, Kevin Hassett &mdash; director of Trump&rsquo;s National Economic Council &mdash; fleshed out what the coming executive order might look like.
&ldquo;We&rsquo;re studying possibly an executive order to give a clear road map to everybody about how this is going to go and how future AIs that also potentially create vulnerabilities should go through a process so that, you know, they&rsquo;re released in the wild after they&rsquo;ve been proven safe, just like an FDA drug.&rdquo;
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Seriously? The FDA is the model for AI regulation?
For decades, the entire purpose of the FDA has been to impose an extensive and costly regulatory regime &mdash; protecting well-capitalized Big Pharma firms that have the resources to shoulder the costs, while freezing out any upstarts.
Of course, it&rsquo;s all sold to the public as necessary for our safety. That&rsquo;s even though the system still allows disasters to come to market like fen-phen (a combo of weight-loss drugs) and Vioxx (a painkiller). Both caused major heart problems and were ultimately withdrawn.
An &ldquo;FDA of AI&rdquo; would send the industry quickly hurtling toward a brick wall.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> This isn&rsquo;t the first time an agency notorious for stifling innovation and progress has been cited as the model for AI regulation.
In May of 2023, about six months after ChatGPT became a phenomenon, we took note when OpenAI chief Sam Altman was hauled before Congress for a hearing.
He shamelessly played to the sensibilities of his audience at that moment &mdash; begging for government regulation and licensing on the grounds that AI might be used to propagate &ldquo;misinformation.&rdquo;
&ldquo;We&rsquo;re going to face an election next year,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;And those models are getting better.&rdquo;
One senator suggested a good template for AI regulation would be the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Altman said the &ldquo;NRC is a great analogy&rdquo; for the sort of regulation he supports.
Reality check: The NRC all but killed off nuclear power in this country: Since the 1970s, construction time for new plants ballooned from four years to 14&hellip; while plans for 60 reactors were scrapped.
Gee, those 60 reactors might&rsquo;ve come in handy right around now when AI needs more electricity and the utility industry can&rsquo;t keep up with the demand. (More about that in Bullet No. 4 today.)
But again, OpenAI was and is an entrenched incumbent in the AI space; it&rsquo;s in Altman&rsquo;s interest to use the heavy hand of government to strangle any up-and-coming competitors.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> &ldquo;Adopting an FDA-style regulatory regime for AI would represent a shocking policy reversal by the Trump administration, and a major about-face on how America has approached software, online speech and digital commerce,&rdquo; says a statement from Neil Chilson at the Abundance Institute and Adam Thierer at the R Street Institute.
The new developments this month mark &ldquo;a startling turn&rdquo; from Trump&rsquo;s previous stance &ldquo;where he allowed tech companies to do what they wanted without hardly any government oversight,&rdquo; the Brookings Institution&rsquo;s Darrell West tells MarketWatch.
Then again, it&rsquo;s not altogether surprising: The major advocate for the hands-off approach was venture capitalist David Sacks &mdash; who left his post as the administration&rsquo;s AI and crypto czar in March.
Sacks, an original member of the &ldquo;PayPal mafia&rdquo; with Peter Thiel and Elon Musk in the 1990s, told Bloomberg he&rsquo;d &ldquo;used up&rdquo; his 130 days as a special government employee not subject to Senate confirmation. (In reality, he was pushed out days after saying the administration should &ldquo;declare victory and get out&rdquo; of the Iran war.)
Investment implications?
<a id="2"></a>
On the one hand, regulation favors all the big incumbents &mdash; both publicly traded ones like Microsoft and Google and the still privately held ones like OpenAI and Anthropic. On the other hand, a lack of up-and-coming competition makes the big incumbents fat and lazy, limiting their profit potential. They become better for short-term trades than long-term investments.
This story is just beginning. We&rsquo;ll stay on top of it in the months ahead&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-2_2x-new.png 2x" alt="2" width="37" />Oil: Reality Reasserting Itself?
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> Maybe the paper price of oil is moving closer to the real-world price of physical barrels.
U.S. futures are up another 4% today, now over $102 &mdash; back to where it was a week ago, before <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/groundhog-day-iran-edition">the alleged &ldquo;scoop&rdquo; by Axios reporter Barak Ravid</a> about the White House &ldquo;getting close to an agreement with Iran on a one-page memorandum of understanding to end the war.&rdquo;
To hear the mainstream tell it, the jump yesterday and today is a function of Trump now pouring cold water on the prospects for a deal, or even for the cease-\fire to hold up.
But really&hellip; is he going to restart the war just before he meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping? (Trump lands in Beijing tomorrow.)
More likely that the price of crude futures is coming into closer alignment with the price of &ldquo;wet&rdquo; barrels for delivery to customers. We&rsquo;ve mentioned regularly that this real-world price is closer to $140 or higher &mdash; and we&rsquo;ve also described <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/the-cia-and-the-oil-price">the long history</a> of how oil futures are manipulated for political ends.
Reality might be starting to assert itself.
Meanwhile, the real-world impacts continue to mount. The following tweet from the owner of an oil-change franchising outfit went viral last night: We present it as a public service announcement in case you missed it.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3ykGJmLSaS1YfgwPQDzG2g/5b9cd804c781a6e244a587247ea3c344/FMF-Issue-051226-1.jpg" alt="Costa Tweet" width="540px" />
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> At the same time the mainstream is finally catching up to what we&rsquo;ve been telling you for weeks&hellip;
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/3b4k5OuipD7VQqX0vA5uB9/b624d8d3c7034a0828f07fae0a610295/FMF-Issue-051226-2.jpg" alt="WSJ Tweet" width="540px" />
Ummm&hellip; we mentioned the supertanker&rsquo;s arrival a week ago today.
And that was on top of Byron King&rsquo;s previous exposes in this space &mdash; one of them <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/about-that-iranian-proposal/#3">over a month old!</a> &mdash; about the dire situation in California thanks to the fact the state is not connected to any major U.S. pipelines and thus relies on imports from the Persian Gulf region.
Byron tells us this week the situation would be even worse were it not for an influx of tankers arriving from the Gulf Coast via the Panama Canal &mdash; more in the last two months than during all of 2025, in fact.
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> The big market-moving story today is the release of the official April inflation figures.
They clocked in more or less as expected &mdash; up 0.6% month-over-month and 3.8% year-over-year. That&rsquo;s the fastest annual pace since May of 2023. Inflation has clearly broken out of the 2.4&ndash;3.0% range where it oscillated from mid-2024 until just before the war began.
With that, nearly every major asset class is selling off&hellip;
<ul>
<li>The S&amp;P 500 is down nearly 1% to 7,344. The Dow&rsquo;s loss is narrower, the Nasdaq&rsquo;s steeper</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Treasury prices are falling, sending yields higher &mdash; the 10-year note back over 4.4% and the 30-year bond over 5%. (Generally these levels have triggered some sort of conciliatory announcement from the administration about the war, the better to calm down the bond market. We&rsquo;ll see&hellip;)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Gold is down nearly $80 to $4,655 and silver down nearly 3% to $83.56. (In fairness, silver needs a rest&hellip;)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Crypto is languishing, with Bitcoin sinking back toward $80,000 and Ethereum at $2,260.</li>
</ul>
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-3_2x-new.png 2x" alt="3" width="37" />Mood on Main Street
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> The vibe on Main Street amid the war is similar to the vibe amid the tariff drama just over a year ago.
The National Federation of Independent Business is out with its monthly Small Business Optimism Index. The April reading is 95.9 &mdash; basically unchanged from March, marking two straight months below the index&rsquo;s long-term average dating back to the mid-1970s. Similar numbers emerged in April 2025 after the fright brought on by the president&rsquo;s &ldquo;Liberation Day&rdquo; announcement.
&ldquo;Inflationary pressures continue to be a challenge for Main Street,&rdquo; says NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. Gee, ya think?
That said, inflation does not top the portion of the survey where respondents are asked to identify their single-most important problem. Instead &ldquo;quality of labor&rdquo; is back on top for the first time in six months; 18% of respondents say good help is hard to find.
&ldquo;In our rural northern California area,&rdquo; says a retailer, &ldquo;qualified/skilled/knowledgeable help is nonexistent. Unskilled is nonexistent.&rdquo;
&ldquo;I&rsquo;m on a livestock farm,&rdquo; says a Tennessee business owner, &ldquo;and it is impossible to find help. Any warm body expects $20 per hour for what should be a minimum-wage job.&rdquo;
&ldquo;It is difficult to find qualified auto technicians that want to progress in this field,&rdquo; says a response from New York.
After labor quality cited by 18%, taxes were right behind at 17% and inflation at 16%. Everything else was 10% or less.
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-4_2x-new.png 2x" alt="4" width="37" />Power Grid: Level 3 Alert
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> U.S. electric utilities are operating under a rare Level 3 alert &mdash; the highest level issued by NERC, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
The reason &mdash; &ldquo;data centers unexpectedly dropping load or oscillating demand rapidly, creating reliability concerns,&rdquo; reports the industry website Utility Dive.
In its own words, NERC warns that utilities &ldquo;generally did not have sufficient processes, procedures or methods to address emerging computational loads.&rdquo;
Don&rsquo;t get the wrong idea: We&rsquo;re not necessarily staring at widespread blackouts this week. But the organization is ordering its member utilities to take seven steps toward stabilizing the grid and report back on their progress by Aug. 3.
Context: Even before AI burst on the scene in late 2022 we were warning the grid was increasingly unstable. Too many coal and nuclear plants were being retired, and there wasn&rsquo;t nearly enough solar and wind capacity coming online to take their place.
AI data centers took a situation that was already urgent and made it dire.
Later this month, NERC will be out with its annual &ldquo;Summer Reliability Assessment&rdquo; &mdash; identifying which parts of the country will be most vulnerable to rolling blackouts in the event of a severe heat wave. We&rsquo;ve been monitoring this report regularly since 2022, so stay tuned&hellip;
<img src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5-new.png" srcset="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/bullet-5_2x-new.png 2x" alt="5" width="37" />Mailbag: Hantavirus
<img class="intrinsic" style="float: left; display: block;" src="https://media.paradigmpressgroup.com/fmf-assets/Paradigm_Logomark_left.png" align="left" /> A couple of readers took the time to write after your editor sounded an early alarm <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/spacex-partners-with-rival">in yesterday&rsquo;s edition</a> about hantavirus, with an eye toward the events of COVID six years ago&hellip;
&ldquo;A point of clarification on that British Army team parachuting onto Tristan da Cunha,&rdquo; says one of our regulars &mdash; &ldquo;it has nothing to do with any containment protocols. Remote island with no airport.&rdquo;
&ldquo;As a board-certified practicing industrial hygienist,&rdquo; says another reader, &ldquo;I feel the hantavirus fears are way overblown and not comparable to a highly communicable respiratory virus like COVID.&nbsp;
&ldquo;Hantavirus is caused by rodent feces that have become dried on surfaces, and through mechanical processes have been able to become airborne and then inhaled. (Even though rare varieties have some ability for person-to-person transmissibility &mdash; such cases still require very close contact between individuals &mdash; and therefore population spread is very limited.)
&ldquo;Appreciate your insights and articles &mdash; even though I sometimes disagree &mdash; I always find your stuff interesting to read.
&ldquo;Keep up the good work &mdash; and thanks for helping us to be better investors.&rdquo;
Dave responds: Thanks to both of you for the input. To be clear, I brought it up yesterday not with an eye toward the actual threat but toward the suspiciously alarmist media treatment. After <a href="https://paradigmpressroom.com/post/covid-9-11">the tyranny and trauma imposed on this land during 2020</a>, I think the wariness is warranted.
One of my must-follows on X in recent weeks is Calvin Froedge, founder of the Marhelm shipping data platform. He says he lost friends in January 2020 when sounding an early alarm about a &ldquo;novel coronavirus&rdquo; emerging in China&rsquo;s Hubei province.
He says he is not ready to sound a similar alarm now. But he&rsquo;s on alert for evidence suggesting hantavirus was subject to gain-of-function research developing a strain that can be easily spread through coughing and sneezing.
That evidence has not emerged yet&hellip; but under the circumstances, it&rsquo;s wise to keep an eye out.
At the very least, it&rsquo;s been discouraging and disquieting this week to look up at my screens of international news channels &mdash; and once again be greeted by the sight of WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
<img class="aligncenter" src="https://images.ctfassets.net/vha3zb1lo47k/4QzdM03vQ4vQ0Z3e7CYune/e4eae8176215b3b377b89a3419250c9c/FMF-Issue-051226-3.jpg" alt="Tedros Interview" width="540px" />
Really, I&rsquo;d have been happy to go through the rest of my life never seeing that guy again&hellip;

Recently Added Articles: